Model Number N/A |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Hematoma (1884)
|
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Per literature review: indian heart journal: comparison of radial versus femoral access using hemostatic devices following percutaneous coronary intervention.Patients were brought in for percutaneous coronary intervention (pci), with those undergoing radial access all having 6f sheath, with radial closure with tr band.Patients ambulated one hour post procedure.There was no device failure or instances of major bleeding or vascular complications.Mean ambulating time was one hour.Duration of hospital stay was 1.78 days.Oozing and localized hematoma not requiring medical or surgical intervention.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Patient identifier - unknown.Age & date of birth - average age 58 years old (range 50-65 years old).Patient sex - 360 males and 59 females.Weight - unknown.Ethnicity - unknown.Race - unknown.Date of event - unknown lot number - unknown.Expiration date - unknown due to unknown catalog number and lot number.Udi - unknown due to unknown catalog number and lot number.Implanted date - device was not implanted.Explanted date - device was not explanted.Contact - unknown.Address - unknown.Telephone number - unknown.Healthcare professional - uknown.Occupation - unknown.Device manufacture date: unknown due to unknown catalog number and lot number.The actual device was not returned for evaluation.The investigation is currently ongoing.A follow-up report will be submitted once the investigation is complete.The production catalog number and lot number were not provided by the user facility, which prevented a meaningful review of the device history record.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted as follow up no.1 to provide the completed investigation results.The actual device was not returned; therefore, an evaluation of the actual device was unable to be conducted.The complaint cannot be confirmed since the device was not available for evaluation.The exact root cause cannot be determined.The dhr could not be reviewed since the device was not available for evaluation.Currently no action is recommended since this risk evaluation is within the predetermined limits in the fmea.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|