• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTR-29
Device Problem Fracture (1260)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/23/2021
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that prior to the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the valve was loaded by an experienced and certified hospital nurse in the presence of the certified sales agent.When the valve was inserted into the compression loading system, the nurse noted that one of the ¿crowns¿ on the outflow portion of the valve frame, next to the paddle, was bent.Attempts to straighten the crown by moving the valve in room temperature saline were unsuccessful.A surgical clamp was also used; however, it was not possible to straighten the outflow crown.The valve was not used.A new valve and a new loading system were used for the procedure.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: upon receipt at medtronic¿s quality laboratory, the device was received in its original packaging and original solution submerged in clear solution.The serial number tag (b)(4) was received with the valve.All leaflets were pliable and intact.Leaflets 1 (l1) and 2 (l2) were in the closed position while leaflet 3 (l3) was partially open.All commissures were intact.One broken strut was observed on the strut adjacent to paddle 1 (cell c81) with bends noted adjacent to the break.The damage on the frame is suggestive of frame misalignment during the loading process.Conclusion: analysis of the returned valve found multiple bends on the strut adjacent to paddle 1.In addition, one of the struts was broken.This type of damage suggests that there was frame misalignment during the loading process that led to this type of damage to the valve frame.Loading of the valve is a process that is highly dependent on the operator technique.In this case, the inspection process per the instructions for use (ifu) was performed and properly identified the bent crowns on the valve, prior to introduction to the patient.There was no mention in the event description of a strut fracture, however, it was reported that the user used a surgical clamp, so it¿s unknown if the user was trying to bend the frame and the frame fractured.It should also be noted that per the medtronic best practices training, the temperature of the loading bath should be between 0-8 degrees celsius.Bath temperatures not sufficiently chilled can lead to excess loading forces.In addition, proper lighting should always be used to visually confirm paddles are properly seated and all outflow crowns are captured within the capsule.While nitinol is a material which features ¿shape memory¿ and ¿super-elastic¿ material properties, extreme levels of strain/deformation beyond the elastic properties of the materials result in permanent/plastic deformation which is not reversed by warming the material.This effect is amplified if the loading process / deformation is not performed while the material is at sufficiently low temperatures, i.E.Ice bath conditions.Permanent deformation of the valve¿s nitinol frame can result from subjecting the device to extreme deformation conditions, such as those occurring during severe misloads of the valve into the compression loading system (cls) or the delivery catheter system (dcs).This event took place prior to introduction of the patient, and no adverse patient effects were reported.Review of the device history record and frame record for this device found it was built to specification and met all inspection and acceptance criteria.No issues were noted that would have impacted this event.This event does not indicate device misuse or malfunction.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key14161624
MDR Text Key292582957
Report Number2025587-2022-01029
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeIT
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 04/20/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/20/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date01/19/2022
Device Model NumberEVOLUTR-29
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTR-29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer03/15/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received04/15/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/19/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-