|
Device Problem
Patient Device Interaction Problem (4001)
|
Patient Problems
Skin Discoloration (2074); Pressure Sores (2326); Blister (4537); Skin Inflammation/ Irritation (4545); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
Event Date 03/09/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient had some blisters under breasts due to the use of arctic gel pads.Per follow-up information received from ibc on 30mar2022, stated that on (b)(6) 2021, the underside of both breasts had been excoriated and red, clotrimazole had been applied.The area's under the breasts had also been broken down further but currently there was granulation here and they would consider the area's to be grade 2 pd.Dressings had been applied.On (b)(6) 2022, patient was receiving active cooling treatment (arctic sun).The equipment the patient was wearing caused injury below their right breast.Equipment position altered.Gauze placed across area to minimise effects of pressure.Nurse in charge was informed and incident was investigated.Although noted that the arctic sun pads had caused a blister, it was noted that in the days running up to the incident it had been reported in the patient's nursing notes that they had severe moisture lesions and sore, friable skin under the breasts already.The patient had an ulcer under their breast that was though to be possibly due to the pads for the arctic sun machine being used to cool the patient.Reading the notes, the user stated that it was clear that the patient was already suffering from broken/ sore skin in this area in the days leading up to the incident.It was unlikely that the equipment alone caused the damage to the patient's skin.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The investigation is still in progress.Once the investigation is complete a supplemental report will be filed.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported event was inconclusive.No sample was returned for evaluation.It is unknown whether the device had met relevant specifications.The product was used for diagnostic and treatment purposes.It was unknown whether the product had caused the reported failure.A potential root cause for this failure could be ¿materials that are contacting the patient¿s intact skin are not biocompatible¿.The lot number was unknown; therefore, the device history record could not be reviewed.Unable to perform labelling review due to unknown product code.Although the product family was unknown, the arctic gel pad product ifus were found to be adequate based on past reviews.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the device was not returned.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that the patient had some blisters under breasts due to the use of arctic gel pads.Per follow-up information received from ibc on 30mar2022, stated that on (b)(6) 2021, the underside of both breasts had been excoriated and red, clotrimazole had been applied.The area's under the breasts had also been broken down further but currently there was granulation here and they would consider the area's to be grade 2 pd.Dressings had been applied.On (b)(6) 2022, patient was receiving active cooling treatment (arctic sun).The equipment the patient was wearing caused injury below their right breast.Equipment position altered.Gauze placed across area to minimise effects of pressure.Nurse in charge was informed and incident was investigated.Although noted that the arctic sun pads had caused a blister, it was noted that in the days running up to the incident it had been reported in the patient's nursing notes that they had severe moisture lesions and sore, friable skin under the breasts already.The patient had an ulcer under their breast that was though to be possibly due to the pads for the arctic sun machine being used to cool the patient.Reading the notes, the user stated that it was clear that the patient was already suffering from broken/ sore skin in this area in the days leading up to the incident.It was unlikely that the equipment alone caused the damage to the patient's skin.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|