• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPOD8
Device Problems Unraveled Material (1664); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/01/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the portal vein using a pod coil and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician placed multiple coils in the target vessel using the microcatheter.Next, the physician advanced a pod coil into the target location; however, the pod coil was not forming to the physician¿s satisfaction.Therefore, the physician decided to remove the pod coil.While retracting, the physician experienced resistance and pulled the pod coil against resistance; consequently, the pod coil unraveled.The physician pulled and removed the majority of the pod coil that had unraveled; however, the remaining distal end of the unraveled pod coil was stuck and could not be removed.Therefore, the physician decided to cut the pod coil, leaving a thread in the portal vein.The physician was satisfied with the packing density and decided to end the procedure.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned pod8 confirmed that the embolization coil was unraveled, and the stretch resistant component was fractured.The unraveling coil was likely due to a stretch resistant component fracture.If the pod8 is forcefully retracted against resistance, damage such as this may occur.Evaluation revealed that the pod8 was returned inside a non-penumbra microcatheter, and both devices were inside a non-penumbra 4f sheath.Further evaluation revealed that the non-penumbra 4f sheath was kinked in multiple locations, and the pod8 and non-penumbra microcatheter were unable to be removed from the 4f sheath.This damage may have contributed to resistance while retracting the pod8 during the procedure.The root cause could not be determined.Further evaluation also revealed the pod8 and non-penumbra microcatheter had kinks throughout their lengths.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint.Penumbra coils are inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key14220178
MDR Text Key291390061
Report Number3005168196-2022-00193
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548019635
UDI-Public814548019635
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,05/18/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received04/27/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPOD8
Device Lot NumberF111447
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received05/05/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/14/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-