• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE SYSTEM; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9750TFX26A
Device Problem Particulates (1451)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/12/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
As reported, upon evaluation of a 26mm ultra sapien valve two small specks were seen.The operators did not implant this valve and a new valve was opened.No patient injury was reported.Additional information indicated that there was no damage to the package or seal, the issue was discovered during rinsing process, the specks were seen inside of the valve on the leaflets.They attempted to rinse the valves to remove the specks and also used small hemostats to try and move the specks.Per pre-decontamination findings, two specks were seen on leaflet #3.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The returned valve was visually inspected, and the following was observed: two (2) blue particulates were located at the inflow side.Two (2) particulates measured 0.02 in diameter.Imagery evaluation was performed, and the following was observed; two (2) specks observed on the leaflet inflow side.All inspections are conducted on 100% of the units except in the case of product verification testing where units are chosen on a sampling basis.It is possible that a potential manufacturing nonconformance contributed to the reported complaint.A device history record review (dhr) was performed and did not reveal any manufacturing nonconformance that would have contributed to this complaint event.A review of the lot history revealed no complaints related to the event device preparation particulate noticed.A complaint history review was performed with the codes device preparation particulate noticed; the complaint occurrence rate did not exceed the applicable trending control limit.The following instructions were reviewed; commander delivery system with s3/s3u and device preparation training manual.No ifu/training deficiencies were identified.A risk assessment was performed on the reported event and revealed no evidence of product non conformances or labeling/ifu inadequacies.The complaint for device preparation particulate noticed was confirmed and a potential nonconformance was identified and assessed; no product risk assessment (pra) escalation is required.A potential manufacturing nonconformance was identified during the investigation.Based on the corrective/preventative actions assessment, a capa is not required, however, at a minimum, as precautionary measures, an awareness communication emphasizing the importance of inprocess mitigation on foreign particulate during manufacturing was performed.The complaint for device preparation particulate noticed was confirmed from the evaluation of the returned valve.A potential manufacturing nonconformance was identified during evaluation.Per material analysis results, the blue particulate showed similar absorption to poly (propylene) material.Process walk through was performed by manufacturing and there were multiple sources of poly (propylene) present in the manufacturing process.Although, during manufacturing process, all sapien 3 ultra valves are 100% visually inspected for particulate, it is possible a potential manufacturing defect contributed to the event.No labeling/ ifu deficiencies were identified during evaluation.As reported, upon evaluation of a 26mm ultra sapien valve, two small specks seen, they decided not to implant and opened a new valve.It is possible that the blue particulates were introduced during device handling/preparation as it was observed during the valve rinsing process or at manufacturing process.As such, available information suggests that improper handling occurred during valve manufacturing (ew manufacturing) or device prepping handling (procedural factors) may have contributed to the complaint event.Based on the assessment of the potential nonconformance; no product risk assessment (pra) escalation is required.A corrective/preventative actions assessment was performed and no capa is required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 ULTRA TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE SYSTEM
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key14320953
MDR Text Key299797502
Report Number2015691-2022-05613
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103201338
UDI-Public(01)00690103201338(17)230628
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 07/12/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date06/28/2023
Device Model Number9750TFX26A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer04/21/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/08/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured06/20/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient SexMale
-
-