Upon receipt at boston scientific's post market laboratory the catheter was visually inspected which revealed a gouge in the body of the sheath's dilator which caused some of the dilator surface to be lifted, they also noted the tip of the dilator was deformed.In addition, a portion of the distal opening of the sheath was damaged and lifted.Next they inspected the interior of the sheath to investigate possible obstructions that could have lead to the damage observed on the dilator, however, no abnormalities were found that could contribute to the damage.Therefore, it could not be determined how and when the damage to the dilator occurred.As for the damage on the sheath itself, it is likely that the damage present on the dilator could have damaged the sheath opening when an attempt was made to retract the dilator during the procedure.The reported allegation was confirmed.
|