The patient¿s attorney alleged a deficiency against the device.
The product was used for therapeutic treatment of urinary incontinence.
It was reported that after implant, the patient experienced incontinence, infections, lumps in groin, bowel trouble, diarrhea, diverticulitis, pain, constipation, anal pain, vaginal infections, bladder infections, discharge, fevers, swelling, urinary incontinence, mesh did not work, urinary retention, pelvic trauma, pelvic tumor or fibroids, unable to have sexual intercourse, adhesions, obesity, wound healing problems, naval hernias, hypotension, psychiatric injury, feelings of frustration, prolapse, cystocele, urinary tract infection, urinary frequency, difficulty voiding/can¿t empty bladder completely, vaginal bleeding, nocturia, occasional enuresis, tenderness, discomfort, urinary urgency, mesh protruding through the anterior vaginal wall, soreness, scar tissue, cystodistention, detrusor overactivity, wound infection, wound leakage, dysuria, fistula, escherichia coli, citrobacter koseri, enterococcus sp.
, (b)(6), klebsiella pneumoniae, pseudomonas aeruginosa, redness, and disability.
Post-operative patient treatment included removal of strings from vagina, large operation, multiple surgeries, medication, asthma meds ventolin preventers, anterior bridge repair, cystoscopy, physiotherapy, scar tissue was incised, vaginal repair, perineorrhaphy, suprapubic catheter placement, intravaginal slingopl asty, vaginal repair with additional ivs implant, and paracetamol.
Surgeon was unable to remove mesh.
|