It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) ablation procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium and foreign material on the device was observed.It was reported there was resistance when trying to advance the dilator through the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium and white debris was found in the hub of the device when flushing the sheath.The vizigo sheath was exchanged and the procedure was continued.Additional information was received indicating the resistance they were having with the sheath occurred as they were trying to put the dilator into the sheath.There was no physical damage on sheath/dilator.There was no occlusion when irrigating the sheath, they said there was a white substance visible when flushing the sheath.The sheath was not narrowed, partially blocked or completely blocked.The dilator was still able to be moved through the sheath and was not stuck in the sheath.The hemostatic valve was not broken/separated.The device was not used on the patient.The customer¿s reported issue of resistance with the sheath is not considered to be an mdr reportable issue since an increased potential for patient injury is remote.
|
It was reported that a patient underwent an atrial fibrillation (afib) ablation procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium and foreign material on the device was observed.It was reported there was resistance when trying to advance the dilator through the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ medium and white debris was found in the hub of the device when flushing the sheath.The vizigo sheath was exchanged and the procedure was continued.Device evaluation details: on 25-may-2022, the product was returned to biosense webster for evaluation.Visual inspection and microscopic examination of the returned device were performed following bwi procedures.Visual analysis revealed that the hemostatic valve was dislodged inside the hub component.Microscopic examination of the hemostatic valve surface showed stress marks on the outer diameter.The stress marks suggest that excessive force or manipulation was applied due to an extreme off axis angle of insertion.Valve dislodgement occurs when extreme off axis angles are performed during insertion with the dilator, outside of what is recommended in the odp (optimal device performance guide).The dilator and a good known lab sample catheter (smart touch) were introduced through the sheath, and no obstructions or resistance was felt.The white debris observed by the customer and the resistance felt during the dilator's insertion, were related to the valve dislodged inside the hub of the device.A device history record was performed for the finished device batch number, and no internal action were identified.The issue reported by the customer was confirmed.The odp contains the following caution: always insert a dilator straight into the center of the sheath¿s valve to prevent damage to the valve.Do not insert a dilator at an angle, as damage to the sheath valve may occur.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's ref.# (b)(4).
|