• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: ST. WENDEL AG ULTRAFLUX AV 1000 S; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

ST. WENDEL AG ULTRAFLUX AV 1000 S; DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM Back to Search Results
Catalog Number 01-8981-0
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 04/05/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported to fresenius that this critically ill patient on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (cvvhd) therapy on the multifiltratepro with the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter experienced a potential clogging event within the multifiltratepro system.An allegation exists stating this event involved the performance of the ultraflux av 1000s in the initial reporting.Fresenius received a report stating this patient with 2nd and 3rd degree burns on 70% of body surface area was hospitalized and placed on cvvhd on (b)(6) 2022, presumably to support renal function while critically ill.The patient required a consumable exchange, including the ultraflux av 1000s.The need for the consumable exchange was not reported; however, there was no indication this exchange was due to any deleterious effects to the patient.Through the course of cvvhd therapy, the fibrogammin administration, tranexamic acid indication, propofol administration as well as the patient¿s triglycerides and albumin were all observed.It was determined that a potential clogging event occurred in the multifiltratepro system involving the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter based on the local clinicians¿ observations.The clinicians¿ alternative theory of the suspected clogging event involved the use of hemosol b0 solution that was consistent with operator error, yet this was not confirmed.Further information including patient demographics, specific laboratory values, patient disposition following cvvhd therapy and causality of the suspected clogging event were not reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
The plant investigation is in process.A supplemental mdr will be submitted upon completion of this activity.  clinical investigation: in the information provided, though a suspected clogging event occurred during cvvhd therapy, there was no indication this patient experienced an adverse event or serious injury related to the clogging event.Additionally, medical intervention for this event was not reported and there was no indication any medical intervention was provided to reverse any harmful effects of the suspected clogging.Based on the available information, there is no indication of a serious injury, patient death, or other adverse event related to a fresenius product.
 
Event Description
It was reported to fresenius that this critically ill patient on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (cvvhd) therapy on the multifiltratepro with the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter experienced a potential clogging event within the multifiltratepro system.An allegation exists stating this event involved the performance of the ultraflux av 1000s in the initial reporting.Fresenius received a report stating this patient with 2nd and 3rd degree burns on 70% of body surface area was hospitalized and placed on cvvhd on 29/mar/2022, presumably to support renal function while critically ill.The patient required a consumable exchange, including the ultraflux av 1000s.The need for the consumable exchange was not reported; however, there was no indication this exchange was due to any deleterious effects to the patient.Through the course of cvvhd therapy, the fibrogammin administration, tranexamic acid indication, propofol administration as well as the patient¿s triglycerides and albumin were all observed.It was determined that a potential clogging event occurred in the multifiltratepro system involving the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter based on the local clinicians¿ observations.The clinicians¿ alternative theory of the suspected clogging event involved the use of hemosol b0 solution that was consistent with operator error, yet this was not confirmed.Further information including patient demographics, specific laboratory values, patient disposition following cvvhd therapy and causality of the suspected clogging event were not reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Plant investigation:.The cause for the failure reported cannot be confirmed based on the current available information.In the past for similar cases, extraction of retain samples showed no unusual residuals which could lead to the reported reaction.Lots are subject to 100% testing prior to release.It is highly unlikely that a failure would be detected during evaluation of another retention sample.This described situation is included within the instruction for use (ifu) and product labeling.A batch record review was also performed.No indication for any relationship with the reported failure mode has been found during the review.Therefore, it is assumed that the patient allergy/reaction might be caused by other factors besides dialyzer, for example, the specific physical/medical status of patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction: h10 (expanding upon initial plant investigation) plant investigation: the reported complaint could not be confirmed.The complaint sample was not available to be returned for evaluation.Due to 100% testing, it is highly unlikely to detect a failure in the retention sample.Furthermore, only a small number of reserve samples is available.Therefore the retention sample analysis is not done.The cause for the failure reported cannot be confirmed based on the current available information.In the past for similar cases, extraction of retain samples showed no unusual residuals which could lead to the reported reaction.Therefore, it is assumed that the patient allergy/reaction might be caused by other factors besides dialyzer, for example, the specific physical/medical status of patient.A review of the instruction for use (ifu) and/or label indicated that the described situation is adequately addressed.A batch record review confirmed that the products have been inspected according to the inspection protocol and were found to be conforming to specifications.No indication for any relationship with the reported failure mode has been found during the review.Based on the information available, the cause of the reported failure could not be traced to the device.
 
Event Description
It was reported to fresenius that this critically ill patient on continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (cvvhd) therapy on the multifiltratepro with the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter experienced a potential clogging event within the multifiltratepro system.An allegation exists stating this event involved the performance of the ultraflux av 1000s in the initial reporting.Fresenius received a report stating this patient with 2nd and 3rd degree burns on 70% of body surface area was hospitalized and placed on cvvhd on 29/mar/2022, presumably to support renal function while critically ill.The patient required a consumable exchange, including the ultraflux av 1000s.The need for the consumable exchange was not reported; however, there was no indication this exchange was due to any deleterious effects to the patient.Through the course of cvvhd therapy, the fibrogammin administration, tranexamic acid indication, propofol administration as well as the patient¿s triglycerides and albumin were all observed.It was determined that a potential clogging event occurred in the multifiltratepro system involving the ultraflux av 1000s hemofilter based on the local clinicians¿ observations.The clinicians¿ alternative theory of the suspected clogging event involved the use of hemosol b0 solution that was consistent with operator error, yet this was not confirmed.Further information including patient demographics, specific laboratory values, patient disposition following cvvhd therapy and causality of the suspected clogging event were not reported.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ULTRAFLUX AV 1000 S
Type of Device
DIALYZER, HIGH PERMEABILITY WITH OR WITHOUT SEALED DIALYSATE SYSTEM
Manufacturer (Section D)
ST. WENDEL AG
fmc deutschland gmbh
frankfurter str. 6-8
st. wendel 66606
GM  66606
Manufacturer (Section G)
ST. WENDEL AG
fmc deutschland gmbh
frankfurter str. 6-8
st. wendel 66606
GM   66606
Manufacturer Contact
jason busch
920 winter st
waltham, MA 02451
9043166958
MDR Report Key14491074
MDR Text Key300446838
Report Number3002807005-2022-00015
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KDI
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeGM
PMA/PMN Number
EUA200149
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Administrator/Supervisor
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/06/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received05/24/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number01-8981-0
Device Lot NumberC2BE3100
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Device AgeMO
Date Manufacturer Received01/06/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
FRESENIUS MULTIFILTRATE SYSTEM; FRESENIUS MULTIFILTRATE SYSTEM; FRESENIUS MULTIFILTRATE SYSTEM
-
-