|
Catalog Number EUP2015X |
Device Problems
Detachment of Device or Device Component (2907); Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
|
Patient Problem
Insufficient Information (4580)
|
Event Date 05/17/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
During a procedure an attempt was made to use one euphora rx ptca balloon catheter to treat a mildly tortuous, mildly calcified lesion exhibiting 40% stenosis located in the mid right coronary artery (rca).The device was inspected with no issues noted.Negative prep was performed with no issues noted.The lesion was pre-dilated.The device did not pass through a previously deployed stent.Resistance was not encountered when advancing the device.Excessive force was not used during delivery.The device was not kinked and restraightened during use.It was reported that the device detached at the catheter during delivery through the vessel.It was stated that the balloon was used several times during the procedure and more than 10 times during treatment to the left side coronary arteries without any problems. after every usage, the balloon was coiled 2 to 3 times and was put aside incase it was needed to be used again. however, one time after being used again, the device was coiled 3 times and the balloon clamped using a forceps, it is not known whether the clamping was on the shaft section or not. then, when proceeding to treat the right coronary arteries, the same balloon was requested again for the pre-dilation process.During inflation, the balloon did not inflate.The balloon was removed from the patient and it was found that the proximal shaft (yellow part) of the euphora balloon was dislodged in the patients artery. the trapping method was used with another balloon to pull out the dislodged section of the shaft through the guiding catheter.The device was successfully removed from the patient.The patient was reported to be alive with no injury.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: there was no resistance noted during withdrawal of the device.Initial reporter phone number provided.A photo of the detached device has been provided from the account.The point of detachment appears to be at the wire entry port of the device.But there is insufficient clarity from the image to determine if there was physical damage due to forceps at this point or if there was a material or processing defect.Correction: the patient was reported to be alive with no further injury.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product analysis summary: a kink was evident on the hypotube.The device returned with a detachment at the exchange joint.The material at the detachment site was jagged and uneven.The distal shaft was kinked and flattened.There was no issue with the proximal balloon bond.The balloon returned deflated.Inflation testing was not possible due to the condition of the device.No deformation was evident to the distal tip.No other damage evident to the remainder of the device.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Additional information: annex d code added correction: update to device evaluation summary: the material at the detachment site was stretched, jagged and uneven.Deformation was evident on the transition shaft at the hypo bond and on the distal shaft.It appeared that the deformation was tooling marks.There was no evidence of necking to the proximal balloon bond.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|