No conclusions can be made.
The patient's attorney alleges adverse patient outcome associated with the hernia mesh used to treat the patient including permanent injury, hernia recurrence, chronic pain, and revision surgery.
The instructions-for-use supplied with the device lists hernia recurrence and inflammation as possible complications.
A review of the manufacturing records was performed and found that the lot was manufactured to specification.
Should additional information be provided, a supplemental emdr will be submitted.
Not returned.
|
Attorney alleges that on or about (b)(6) 2013, the patient underwent repair of an abdominal hernia and was implanted with a bard/davol ventralex mesh and a non-bard mesh.
It is alleged that "as a direct and proximate result of defendants¿ defective design, manufacture, marketing, distribution, and/or sale of the ventralex and proceed and placing the defective product into the stream of commerce, the patient has been injured and damaged as follows": on or about (b)(6) 2015, the patient underwent revision of the ventralex mesh and the non bard/davol mesh.
It is alleged that the patient experienced and/or continues to experience severe and chronic pain/discomfort, inflammation, mesh detachment, mesh reinforcement, and recurrence.
It is alleged that the patient continues to suffer complications as a result of implantation with the bard/davol ventralex and non bard/davol mesh.
It is alleged that the patient is at higher risk of severe complications during an abdominal surgery.
It is alleged that the patient has suffered and will continue to suffer physical pain and suffering, as well as mental anguish and emotional distress.
It is also alleged that the patient have been injured, sustained severe and permanent pain, suffering, anxiety, depression, disability, impairment.
Attorney alleges "past, present, and future damages, including but not limited to, pain and suffering for severe and permanent personal injuries sustained by the patient and permanent impairment.
".
|