Model Number KD-620LR |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001)
|
Event Date 06/17/2020 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.The literature article is attached for additional information.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
|
|
Event Description
|
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "the use of endoscopic clipping in preventing delayed complications after endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors".This retrospective cohort study described the use of endoscopic clipping in preventing delayed complications after endoscopic resection for superficial non-ampullary duodenal tumors.Patients were divided into 2 groups: the immediate clipping group (icg) and the no clipping group (ncg).Endoscopic mucosal resection (emr) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) were performed using either twin-channel multi-bending gastroscopes (gif-2tq260m; olympus) or conventional gastroscopes (gif-h260 or gif-hq290; olympus).An initial incision was made outside the marks using either a dual knife (kd-655; olympus) or a hook knife (kd-620lr; olympus).After er, the mucosal defect was closed using clips (hx-610-090l; olympus ) delivered by a clip-fixing device (hx 110ur; olympus).A total of 99 lesions from 99 patients were included in this study.Fifty-two patients were allocated into icg and 47 patients were allocated into ncg.Delayed bleeding occurred in 1 patient from icg and in 8 patients from ncg.Delayed perforation occurred in 1 patient from icg and in 3 patients from ncg.There were no procedure-related deaths in both groups.This study concluded that although the use of endoscopic clipping seemed to reduce the risk of developing delayed complications, further studies using a prospective design is required.Type of adverse events/number of patients: delayed perforation (4), delayed bleeding (9), immediately complication (perforation n=1, bleeding n=5).The authors used six olympus devices and did not specify which device was used on the patients with adverse events.Patient identifier (b)(6): gif-2tq260m, we selected "gif-2tq260m" as a representative product.Patient identifier (b)(6): gif-hq290.Patient identifier (b)(6): kd-655l, we selected "kd-655l" as a representative product.Patient identifier (b)(6): kd-620lr.Patient identifier (b)(6): hx-610-090l.Patient identifier (b)(6): hx-110ur.This report is 4 of 6 for patient identifier (b)(6): kd-620lr.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since the lot number was not provided.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, the relationship between the device and the adverse event cannot be confirmed.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This supplemental report is being submitted to provide additional information from the author.
|
|
Event Description
|
The author provided additional information: the author responded with no when asked for medical or surgical intervention for the reported adverse events.No olympus device malfunctioned.In the opinion of the author, the olympus device did not cause or contribute to the adverse events.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|