• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO. INTELLIS; STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR Back to Search Results
Model Number 97715
Device Problem Overheating of Device (1437)
Patient Problems Burning Sensation (2146); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 01/11/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neu rostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient was feeling heating and burning sensation at pocket site while charging ins.Pt reports it feels like internal heating with lead wire where it connects into ins.Pt is very thin (100 lbs) and petite per caller.Pt says this heating became intense over past week and pt's husband says this has been going on for about 4 months.The agent reviewed checking to see if there have been any ins position changes at pocket site or changes in recharge practice that may be a factor.The agent also reviewed issue with recharger heating at base of paddle and to rule that out as an issue.Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The rep reported that they were going to meet the patient on (b)(6) 2022 at their appointment to evaluate the system.They will reach out to the manufacturer to the day of the appointment.This information was also confirmed with a physician/account.Additional information was received.It was reported that the rep met with the patient today (b)(6) 2022 and confirmed the recharger heats up when recharging.The rep also mentioned the controller heats up as well.Patient lost a lot of weight and the rep can see the wires.The impedance check was normal per rep.A replacement recharger was sent to the patient.Additional information was received.It was reported that the ins heating issue was not resolved when the patient received their replacement recharger (rtm).The rep stated patient received the replacement recharger and with replacement, indicated that it feels like the ins is getting very hot af ter 3-4 minutes of recharging.The rep will meet with the patient again to re-evaluate.This was confirmed with the physician/account.The rep stated they (and the healthcare provider (hcp)) saw the patient last week and impedances were good.Caller confirmed that the issue is only when recharging.The agent suggested recharging best practices (using belt, using thin piece of clothing, etc.), imaging to ensure the ins hasn't moved and potentially, moving ins to different location or replacing ins with a non-rechargeable.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep).It was reported that the cause of the ins heating during recharge was not determined.The actions/interventions taken to resolve the ins heating during recharge were that the recharging paddle was replaced and the patient has since stopped recharging and has started the process of having the implant scheduled to be explanted.The ins heating during recharge has not been resolved.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
B3: date of event is month and year valid.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reporting the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was explanted on (b)(6) 2022.The rep will be returning the explanted ins for product analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3: analysis of pli# 10, product id# 97715, found significant anomaly.Analysis of product id 977a260, serial# (b)(6), product type lead.Product id 977a260, serial# (b)(6), product type lead, found significant anomaly.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neu rostimulator (ins).It was reported that the patient was feeling heating and burning sensation at pocket site while charging ins.Pt reports it feels like internal heating with lead wire where it connects into ins.Pt is very thin (100 lbs) and petite per caller.Pt says this heating became intense over past week and pt's husband says this has been going on for about 4 months.The agent reviewed checking to see if there have been any ins position changes at pocket site or changes in recharge practice that may be a factor.The agent also reviewed issue with recharger heating at base of paddle and to rule that out as an issue.Additional information was received from a manufacturer representative (rep) regarding a patient (pt) who was implanted with an implantable neurostimulator (ins).The rep reported that they were going to meet the patient on (b)(6) 2022 at their appointment to evaluate the system.They will reach out to the manufacturer to the day of the appointment.This information was also confirmed with a physician/account.Additional information was received.It was reported that the rep met with the patient today ((b)(6) 2022) and confirmed the recharger heats up when recharging.The rep also mentioned the controller heats up as well.Patient lost a lot of weight and the rep can see the wires.The impedance check was normal per rep.A replacement recharger was sent to the patient.Information was received.It was reported that the ins heating issue was not resolved when the patient received their replacement recharger (rtm).The rep stated pati ent received the replacement recharger and with replacement, indicated that it feels like the ins is getting very hot after 3-4 minutes of recharging.The rep will meet with the patient again to re-evaluate.This was confirmed with the physician/account.The rep s tated they (and the healthcare provider (hcp)) saw the patient last week and impedances were good.Caller confirmed that the issue is only when recharging.The agent suggested recharging best practices (using belt, using thin piece of clothing, etc.), imaging to ensure the ins hasn't moved and potentially, moving ins to different location or replacing ins with a non-rechargeable.Additional information was received.It was reported that the cause of the ins heating during recharge was not determined.The actions/interventions taken to resolve the ins heating during recharge were that the recharging paddle was replaced and the patient has since stopped recharging and has started the process of having the implant scheduled to be explanted.The ins heating during recharge has not been resolved.Additional information was received from the manufacturer representative (rep) reporting the implantable neurostimulator (ins) was explanted on (b)(6) 2022.The rep will be returned the explanted ins for product analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis #705009721:analysis information 2022-11-15 11:38:55 cst pli# 10 product id# 97715 below is unedited, system generated text based on the analysis finding code(s).The returned device was subjected to a series of standard tests that include but is not limited to visual inspection, output and telemetry testing, and functional testing.The implantable neurostimulator (ins) passed functional testing.Product id 97755 lot# serial# (b)(6) product type recharger product id 977a260 lot# serial# (b)(6) product type lead product id 977a260 lot# serial# (b)(6) product type lead h3: analysis of the recharger (product id 97755 lot# serial# (b)(6)) found no issues with finding or charging the ins.This regulatory report is being submitted as part of a retrospective review as part of remediation plan 411 medtronic submits this report to comply with fda regulations 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to provide as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.Medtronic will submit a supplemental report if additional relevant information becomes known.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INTELLIS
Type of Device
STIMULATOR, SPINAL-CORD, TOTALLY IMPLANTED FOR
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC PUERTO RICO OPERATIONS CO.
road 31, km. 24, hm 4
ceiba norte industrial park
juncos PR 00777
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key14602258
MDR Text Key293362139
Report Number3004209178-2022-07201
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LGW
UDI-Device Identifier00643169781702
UDI-Public00643169781702
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P840001
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup,Followup,Followup
Report Date 03/20/2024
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received06/06/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date11/28/2019
Device Model Number97715
Device Catalogue Number97715
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Manufacturer Received05/23/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/10/2018
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
"SEE H10...."; "SEE H11...."
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age54 YR
Patient SexFemale
Patient Weight45 KG
-
-