CORDIS CORPORATION POWERFLEXPRO 10MM6CM 135; CATHETER, ANGIOPLASTY, PERIPHERAL, TRANSLUMINAL
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 4401006X |
Device Problem
Burst Container or Vessel (1074)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 05/26/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Event Description
|
As reported, the balloon of a powerflex pro 10mmx6cm 135cm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter burst after filling.The balloon ruptured/burst at below rbp.The procedure was completed by using another unknown non cordis balloon.The product was removed intact from the patient and there was no reported patient injury.The device was being used for post-dilation.The lesion had little calcification and no tortuosity.The lesion had an 88% stenosis.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The balloon ruptured/burst at below rbp.The balloon passed through a stent but did not rupture in the stent.The contrast to saline ratio used was one to one.An unknown indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance or friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve or while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion and the catheter was never in an acute bend.The product was stored properly and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop.There was no difficulty removing the protective balloon cover, the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device was prepped normally.Other procedural details were requested but are unknown, unavailable, not answered, or not applicable.The device will be returned for evaluation.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
A review of the manufacturing documentation associated with lot 82222559 presented no issues during the manufacturing process that can be related to the reported event.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
d10, h3 corrected. h6 component code listed. .
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
After further review of additional information received the following sections have been updated accordingly: g3, g6, h1, h2, h3, h6, and h10 as reported, the balloon of a powerflex pro 10mmx6cm 135cm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter burst after filling.The balloon ruptured/burst at below rbp.The procedure was completed by using another unknown non-cordis balloon.The product was removed intact from the patient and there was no reported patient injury.The device was being used for post-dilation.The lesion had little calcification and no tortuosity.The lesion had an 88% stenosis.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The balloon passed through a stent but did not rupture in the stent.The contrast to saline ratio used was 1:1.An unknown indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance or friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve or while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion and the catheter was never in an acute bend.The product was stored properly and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop, removing the protective balloon cover, the stylet, or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device was prepped normally.Other procedural details were requested but are unknown, unavailable, not answered, or not applicable.The product was returned for analysis.A non-sterile powerflex pro 10mm x 6cm 135 percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) unit was received for analysis inside a plastic bag.Per visual analysis, a rupture was observed on the balloon of the powerflex pro 10mm x 6cm 135 catheter unit.No other anomalies could be observed by the naked eye.Per functional testing, a lab sample inflator/deflator device partially filled with water was attached to the inflation lumen of the unit and pressure was applied.A leakage was observed coming from the rupture on the balloon.No other anomalies were observed.Per microscopic analysis, sem was performed to the received balloon unit to identify the possible root cause of the balloon rupture.Results showed that the balloon of the powerflex pro presented evidence of a ruptured condition and scratch marks near the damaged area.This type of damage is commonly caused during the interaction of the material with a sharp object or mechanical damage.It is very likely that the same factors that caused the observed scratch marks on the balloon probably led to the damaged condition found on the received device.It seems the material near the damage could have been ruptured by a sharp object from the outside of the device.No other anomalies were observed during the sem analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82222559 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon burst - at/below rbp¿ was confirmed via device analysis as a leakage was noted coming from a ruptured are on the balloon surface.However, the exact cause cannot be determined.The outer surface of the balloon presented evidence of scratch marks adjacent to the balloon rupture.The balloon material near the rupture, appears to have been punctured either due to the interaction of the balloon with calcified spicules located on the lesion or with a sharp object from the outside of the balloon.Therefore, based on the information available for review, it is likely vessel characteristics of calcification and stenosis likely contributed to the reported event as evidenced by device analysis.According to the safety information in the instructions for use, ¿if resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Balloon pressure should not exceed the rated burst pressure.The rated burst pressure is based on the results of in vitro testing.At least 99.9% of the balloons (with a 95% confidence), will not burst at or below their rated burst pressure.Use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended to prevent over pressurization.Use only the recommended balloon inflation medium.Never use air or any gaseous medium to inflate the balloon.Prior to angioplasty, the catheter should be examined to verify functionality and ensure that its size and shape are suitable for the specific procedure for which it is to be used.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported events for both devices.Therefore, no corrective or preventive actions will be taken at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
After further review of additional information received the following sections have been updated accordingly: g3, g6, h1, h2, h3, h6, and h10.The balloon of a powerflex pro 10mmx6cm 135cm percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (pta) balloon catheter burst after filling.The balloon ruptured/burst at below rbp.The procedure was completed by using another unknown non cordis balloon.The lesion had little calcification and no tortuosity.The lesion had an 88% stenosis.The device was not used for a chronic total occlusion (cto).The product was removed intact from the patient and there was no reported patient injury.The device was being used for post-dilation.The balloon passed through a stent but did not rupture in the stent.The contrast to saline ratio used was one to one.An unknown indeflator was used successfully with other devices.There was no resistance or friction while inserting the balloon through the rotating hemostatic valve or while inserting the balloon through the guide catheter.There was no difficulty advancing the balloon catheter through the vessel.There was no difficulty crossing the lesion and the catheter was never in an acute bend.The product was stored properly and prepped according to the instructions for use (ifu).There was no difficulty removing the product from the hoop.There was no difficulty removing the protective balloon cover, the stylet or any of the sterile packaging components.There were no kinks or other damages noted prior to inserting the product into the patient.The device was prepped normally.Other procedural details were requested but are unknown, unavailable, not answered, or not applicable.The product was not returned for analysis.A product history record (phr) review of lot 82222559 revealed no anomalies or non-conformances during the manufacturing and inspection processes that can be associated with the reported event.The reported ¿balloon burst-at/below rbp¿ could not be confirmed as the device was not returned for analysis.The exact cause could not be determined.Vessel characteristics of a rate of stenosis of 88% may have contributed to the reported event.According to the safety information in the instructions for use ¿if resistance is met during manipulation, determine the cause of the resistance before proceeding.Balloon pressure should not exceed the rated burst pressure.The rated burst pressure is based on the results of in vitro testing.At least 99.9% of the balloons (with a 95% confidence), will not burst at or below their rated burst pressure.Use of a pressure monitoring device is recommended to prevent over pressurization.Use only the recommended balloon inflation medium.Never use air or any gaseous medium to inflate the balloon.Prior to angioplasty, the catheter should be examined to verify functionality and ensure that its size and shape are suitable for the specific procedure for which it is to be used.¿ neither the phr nor the information available suggests a design or manufacturing related cause for the reported event; therefore, no corrective/preventive action will be taken at this time.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
After further review of additional information received the following sections have been updated accordingly: g3, g6, h1, h2, h3, h6, and h10.Additional information is pending and will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.This device is available for analysis but the engineering report is not yet available.However, it will be submitted within 30 days upon receipt.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|