• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION; NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION; NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK_NAV_SYS
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Unspecified Infection (1930)
Event Date 01/19/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Patient information was not included in the journal entry.This value reflects the mean age of the patients who underwent the cervical spine procedure as specific patients could not be identified.This value reflects the majority gender of the patients who underwent the cervical spine procedure as specific patients could not be identified.The article did not provide the date of the procedure.The event date provided is the accepted date.The article citation is included.The system product number and serial number were not provided in the journal article.Udi not available for this system.No pma/510k provided as system is unknown.No evaluation was performed as the event was reported as a literature article.Device manufacturing date is unavailable.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Zhang, k., chen, h., chen, k., yang, p., yang, h., <(>&<)>amp; mao, h.(2022).O-arm navigated cervical pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of lower cervical fracture-dislocation.Orthopaedic surgery, 14(6), 1135¿1142.Https://doi.Org/10.1111/os.13227.Summary: objective: to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cervical pedicle screw (cps) placement with o-arm navigation in the treatment of lower cervical fracture-dislocation.Methods: a retrospective clinical study was performed involving 42 consecutivepatients with lower cervical spine fracture dislocation who underwent cps fixation surgery with o-arm navigation (cps group) or received conventional lateral mass screw (lms) fixation surgery (lms group) between august 2015 and august 2019.Accuracy of cps position was evaluated by postoperative ct.The clinical parameters including preoperative and final follow-up japanese orthopaedic association(joa) score and american spinal injury association (asia) impairment scale, preoperative sub-axial injury classification (slic) score, number of fixation segments, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, injury mechanism, injury location, surgical complications were also assessed between the two groups.Results: in lms group, the preoperative slic score was 7.5 +/- 0.9, asia score improvement was 0.8 +/- 0.5, joa score improvement was 3.0 +/- 1.8, mean operation time was 204 +/- 89 min, intraoperative blood loss was 311 +/- 127 ml.In cps group, the preoperative slic score was 7.3 +/- 1.2, asia score improvement was 0.9 +/- 0.5, joa score improvement was 3.2 +/- 2.4, mean operation time is 241 +/- 85 min, intraoperative blood loss is about 327 +/- 120 ml.There was no significant difference in terms of above clinical parameters between the two groups (p > 0.05), the fixation segments in cps group (3.5 +/- 1.1) were less than that in lms group (4.2 +/- 0.7) (p = 0.037).The accuracy of cps insertion was evaluated based on postoperative ct.Of all the 118 cpss, 83 (70.3%) were defined as grade 0; 27 (22.9%) as grade 1; eight (6.8%) as grade 2; and none as grade 3.Cps malposition rate in this study was 6.8%.In this study, there was no direct intraoperative or postoperative complication caused by cps or lms insertion.All the operations were successfully completed in two groups.One of the patients in lms group presented cerebrospinal fluid leak caused by bone fragment broken of the dural sac, which led to delayed incision healing.Cps group and lms group both had two patients who suffered pulmonary infection after surgery.A total of 78.6% of the patients showed evidence of neurologic recovery.Satisfactory reduction was achieved in all cases and maintained throughout the follow-up duration.Conclusion: in the treatment of lower cervical spine fracture-dislocation, cervical pedicle screw insertion with o-arm navigation is a safe and effective method for posterior fixation.Reported events: twenty two patients with a histology of lower cervical spine fracture-dislocation underwent a cervical spine procedure.Two patients suffered a pulmonary infection after surgery.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION
Type of Device
NEUROLOGICAL STEREOTAXIC INSTRUMENT
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC NAVIGATION, INC
826 coal creek circle
louisville CO 80027
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
7000 central avenue ne rcw215
minneapolis, MN 55432
6122713209
MDR Report Key14943642
MDR Text Key295405394
Report Number1723170-2022-01036
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HAW
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCH
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/07/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/07/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK_NAV_SYS
Device Catalogue NumberUNK_NAV_SYS
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received06/30/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? No
Is the Device Single Use? No
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Reuse
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient Age52 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-