• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS ESHEATH PLUS; INTRODUCER, CATHETER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS ESHEATH PLUS; INTRODUCER, CATHETER Back to Search Results
Model Number 914ESPA
Device Problems Peeled/Delaminated (1454); Difficult to Remove (1528)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 06/22/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.Device not returned.
 
Event Description
As reported by field clinical specialist (fcs), during a procedure to implant a 23mm sapien 3 ultra, during post dilation the non-edwards balloon ruptured.The balloon was fully inflated for a second, then it burst, folded on itself and would not come out through the sheath.The esheath was split about 1 inch back from the tip at the distal end.A surgical cutdown was performed with success.No blood transfusion was required and the closure was successful.Photos provided by the fcs revealed that the liner was delaminated.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H2 h6 updated the esheath was not returned; therefore, a visual inspection, functional testing, dimensional testing was not performed.Imagery was provided by the site and revealed the following: calcification and tortuosity observed in patient access vessels.The nonedwards balloon was ruptured and stuck in the sheath with the sheath liner fully and circumferentially delaminated.A device history record (dhr) review was done and did not reveal any manufacturing nonconformance issues that would have contributed to the event.No device was returned and there is no evidence to support a manufacturing/design defect potentially contributing to the complaint, therefore a manufacturing mitigation review is not required.A lot history review was performed and revealed no other complaints relating to failure sheath liner delamination and withdraw catheter and valve through sheath nonedwards device withdrawal inability through esheath.A complaint history review on confirmed device complaints for failure sheath liner delamination identified patient factors: tortuosity as a potential root cause applicable to the event.A complaint history review was performed with the code withdraw catheter and valve through sheath nonedwards device withdrawal inability through esheath, however, no complaints were identified.This event reports a negative device interaction with a non edwards device.There was no evidence of product nonconformances or labeling/ifu inadequacies identified in the evaluation.Edwards continues to monitor complaint history on a monthly basis.The following instructions were reviewed; commander instruction for use (ifu) and procedural training manual.No ifu/training deficiencies were identified.The complaints for failure sheath liner delamination, and withdraw catheter and valve through sheath nonedwards device withdrawal inability through esheath were confirmed based on returned imagery.As no device returned for evaluation, no visual inspection, functional testing, or dimensional analysis was able to be performed.As such, a manufacturing nonconformance was unable to be determined.However, review of dhr, lot history, and complaint history did not identify any nonconformances.A review of ifu/training materials revealed no deficiencies.Furthermore, no abnormities during device unpacking or preparation were noted.As reported, as reported by field clinical specialist (fcs), during a procedure to implant a 23mm sapien 3 ultra, during post dilation the nonedwards balloon ruptured.The balloon was fully inflated for a second, then it burst, folded on itself and would not come out through the sheath.The esheath was split about 1 inch back from the tip at the distal end.A surgical cutdown was performed with success.No blood transfusion was required, and the closure was successful.Photos provided by the fcs revealed that the liner was delaminated.It is likely that the increased profile of the burst balloon resulted in the inability to withdraw the nonedwards inflation system through the sheath.Returned 3mensio also confirmed that calcification and tortuosity was present in the patient access vessel.Patient factors such as calcification and tortuosity can create suboptimal angles leading to nonaxial alignment and further increase retrieval difficulty.As such, available information suggests that patient factors (calcification, tortuosity) and/or procedural factors (retrieval of burst balloon) likely contributed to the complaint event.Since no edwards defect, which could have resulted in the complaint, was confirmed, no preventative or corrective actions (capa) are required.Since no product non conformances or ifu/training deficiencies were identified during evaluation, a product risk assessment (pra) escalation is not required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS ESHEATH PLUS
Type of Device
INTRODUCER, CATHETER
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key15027642
MDR Text Key295968093
Report Number2015691-2022-06795
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code DYB
UDI-Device Identifier00690103215465
UDI-Public(01)00690103215465(17)240323(11)2203242164291387
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K200258
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 08/26/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received07/15/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date03/23/2024
Device Model Number914ESPA
Device Lot Number64291387
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured03/24/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexMale
-
-