On (b)(6) 2022, the lay-user/patient¿s daughter contacted lifescan (lfs), alleging that the patient¿s onetouch ultra2 meter read inaccurately high compared to their feelings and/or normal readings.The complaint was classified based on the customer care agent (cca) documentation and on additional information obtained by the medical surveillance specialist (mss) after reviewing the call recording.The reporter stated that the alleged meter inaccuracy occurred on (b)(6) 2022 when the patient obtained an inaccurate high result of ¿495 mg/dl¿ with the subject meter at approximately 4:00 pm.During the call, the reporter informed the cca that the patient does not normally take any medication to manage their diabetes.The reporter stated that the patient had not used insulin for over 1 year; however, they took 25 units of insulin in response to the elevated result.The reporter claimed the patient began to feel ¿lethargic¿ and started ¿sweating¿ on the afternoon of (b)(6) 2022, after the alleged issue occurred.In response to the symptoms, the reporter claimed they took the patient to the emergency room where they were treated with glucose gel.The reporter claimed the patient¿s blood glucose measured ¿22 mg/dl¿ on the hospital meter before receiving treatment.At the time of troubleshooting, the cca confirmed the unit of measure was set correctly on the subject meter.The cca noted the test strips were stored correct and were not expired or opened past their discard date.The cca noted the patient did not have control solution available to perform a quality control test.Replacement products were sent to the patient.This complaint is being reported because the patient reportedly developed signs/symptoms suggestive of a serious injury adverse event after administering insulin based on an alleged inaccurate high result obtained with the subject meter.
|