|
Model Number UNK-NV-FG |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problem
Thromboembolism (2654)
|
Event Date 03/31/2021 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Associated with devices reported previously in rr #'s: 2029214-2021-00417 & 2029214-2021-00418 only the year of the reported date-of-birth is valid (1930).Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
Medtronic received a report that there was thrombus fragmentation during stent retriever removal from the m1 branch.This resulted in distal embolization of little fragment of thrombus to the distal m3 parietal in the same territory of the cerebral artery.The event did not result in hospitalization or any treatment/intervention.There was no injury to the patient reported as a result of the event.It was assessed the event had a causal relationship with the disease under study and procedure as well as a probable relatedness to the solitaire device.The patient was undergoing surgery for thrombectomy of the middle cerebral artery (mca) m1.The patient's modified rankin scale (mrs) score was 2 and national institutes of health stroke scale (nihss) score was 23.The pre-procedure modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mtici) score was 0, and post-procedure mtici was 2c.Additional information received reported that no treatment was performed to retrieve the clot in the distal m3 location.The index procedure was completed after the second pass with a tici score of 2c.It could not be determined which of the two stent retrievers were used when the thrombus fragmented.Lot b083029 was used in pass #1 with a tici score 0.In pass #2 both stents were used with a tici score 2c.Additional information received corrected that the final post-procedure mtici score was 2b.Additional information received reported the medtronic study sponsor noted that a phenom 21 microcatheter was used in the index procedure and conservatively considers that the catheter could possibly be related to the event.
|
|
Event Description
|
Additional information received reported that cec readjudicated event as possible related to solitaire and phenom 21 mdt microcatheter and causal relationship to procedure.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|