A physician reported a certas valve (id 828810) was implanted via v-p shunt in 2019 with unknown setting.The ventricles size did not change, then the setting was set to 2.A ct imaging was performed and shunt failure was suspected; therefore, the valve was removed and replaced on (b)(6) 2022.
|
The certas valve was returned for evaluation.Device history record (dhr) - no anomalies.Failure analysis - the valve was visually inspected; the needle guard was raised and holes in the needle chamber were noted.The position of the cam when valve was received was at setting 2.The valve was hydrated.The catheter was irrigated no occlusion noted.The valve was leak tested and only leaked from the needle hole in the needle chamber.The valve passed the test for programming, occlusion, reflux, siphon guard and pressure.The needle chamber was dismantled; the needle guard was bent, and glue traces were noted on the needle guard and the silicone base.No root cause could be determined as the technician could not confirm any shunt failure at the time of investigation.The root cause for the raised needle guard noted during the investigation is due to wrong handling as noted in the ifu: do not fold or bend the valve, folding or bending might cause rupture of the silicone housing, needle guard disc dislodgement or occlusion of the fluid pathway.The possible root cause for the issue reported by the customer, could be due to biological debris and protein build up interfering with the valve mechanism at the time of investigation no functional issues were noted with the valve.
|