BIOSENSE WEBSTER INC CARTO VIZIGO¿ 8.5F BI-DIRECTIONAL GUIDING SHEATH ¿ SMALL; INTRODUCER, CATHETER
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number D138501 |
Device Problems
Material Separation (1562); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/01/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Initial reporter phone: (b)(4).If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 4.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by biosense webster, inc., or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, biosense webster, inc., or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that a patient underwent a premature ventricular contraction (pvc) ablation procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ small and a hemostatic valve separation issue occurred.The physician stated that it was difficult to insert the dilator into the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ small because the touch of the dilator was hard.When checked, the hemostatic valve had come off.This occurred before the procedure was started and the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ small was changed, the procedure was then started.After that, procedure was completed without problem.Hemostatic valve fell into the hub.The hemostatic valve itself was not cracked.The procedure was completed without patient's consequence.Additional information was received.The hemostatic valve was dislodged in the hub.The hemostatic valve did not break into two or more separate pieces.The hemostatic valve/brim cap/hub did not become detached from the sheath.The resistance with sheath issue was assessed as not mdr reportable.Interference or friction between devices is a known occurrence.If resistance is encountered, the system may be withdrawn as a unit.This is a common practice during procedures.Since the vast majority of ep procedures utilize multiple device exchanges, an increased potential for patient injury was remote.The hemostatic valve issue was assessed as mdr reportable for a hemostatic valve separation issue.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The bwi product analysis lab received the device for evaluation on 29-jul-2022.The analysis has begun but is not completed at this time.When the investigational analysis has been completed, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device evaluation was completed on 26-aug-2022.It was reported that a patient underwent a premature ventricular contraction (pvc) ablation procedure with a carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ small and a hemostatic valve separation issue occurred.The physician stated that it was difficult to insert the dilator into the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ small because the touch of the dilator was hard.When checked, the hemostatic valve had come off.This occurred before the procedure was started and the carto vizigo¿ 8.5f bi-directional guiding sheath ¿ small was changed, the procedure was then started.After that, procedure was completed without problem.Hemostatic valve fell into the hub.The hemostatic valve itself was not cracked.The procedure was completed without patient's consequence.Additional information was received.The hemostatic valve did not break into two or more separate pieces.The hemostatic valve/brim cap/hub did not become detached from the sheath.The product was returned to biosense webster (bwi) for evaluation.Visual inspection and microscopic examination of the returned device were performed following bwi procedures.Visual analysis revealed that the hemostatic valve was dislodged inside the hub component.Microscopic examination of the hemostatic valve surface showed stress marks on the outer diameter.The stress marks suggest that excessive force or manipulation was applied due to an extreme off axis angle of insertion.Valve dislodgement occurs when extreme off axis angles are performed during insertion with the dilator, outside of what is recommended in the odp (optimal device performance guide).The hemostatic valve dislodged inside the hub could be related to the obstruction reported by the customer.A device history record was performed for the finished device batch number, and no internal actions were identified.The issue reported by the customer was confirmed.The odp contains the following caution: always insert a dilator straight into the center of the sheath¿s valve to prevent damage to the valve.Do not insert a dilator at an angle, as damage to the sheath valve may occur.As part of the quality process, all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.This product issue will be addressed through bwi's quality system.If additional information is received regarding this event, a supplemental 3500a report will be submitted to the fda.Manufacturer's reference number: (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|