|
Model Number SGC0701 |
Device Problems
Crack (1135); Leak/Splash (1354); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
|
Patient Problem
No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
|
Event Date 07/12/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device will not be returned for evaluation, the device was reportedly discarded.Investigation is not yet complete.A follow-up report will be submitted with all additional relevant information.The clip delivery system (cds) mentioned is filed under a separate medwatch report number.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is being filed for a loss of column that required additional aspiration.It was reported that on (b)(6) 2022, a patient presented with grade 4 primary mitral regurgitation (mr).An xtw clip was successfully implanted.The steerable guide catheter (sgc) was in the patient when a loss of column and blood was observed.Additional aspiration was needed outside of standard instruction for use (ifu) procedure.The column was still not holding, and it was discovered that the stopcock was cracked on the sgc.The physician quickly removed the sgc along with the clip delivery system (cds), as the xtw was already deployed.The cds was removed without fully retracting the spear (distal mandrel) into the introducer, and potentially lacerated the hemostasis valve of the sgc.The cds was removed and a new sgc was prepped.The procedure was completed with a 2nd clip implanted, reducing the mr to 1-2.There was no adverse patient effect or clinically significant delay.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The device was not returned for analysis.A review of the lot history record revealed no manufacturing nonconformities issued to the reported lot that would have contributed to this event.Additionally, a review of the complaint history identified no similar complaints reported from this lot.Based on the information reviewed, a cause for the reported crack on the sgc (flush port) could not be determined.The reported leak/splash associated with loss of fluid column during procedure was a cascading effect of the reported crack.The reported material split, cut or torn of the hemostasis valve appears to related to user technique.The unexpected medical intervention was a result of case-specific circumstances.There is no indication of a product issue with respect to manufacture, design, or labeling.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|