No patient specific details have been provided.Therefore, the patient initials reflect the w.L.Gore internal case number.(b)(4).This event is also reported with gore (b)(4) number (manufacturer report number 3003910212-2022-01390) for the second gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement.W.L.Gore & associates, inc.(gore) is submitting this report to comply with 21 c.F.R.Part 803, the medical device reporting regulation.This report is based upon information obtained by gore, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Blank fields present on this report include required fields and fields determined to be not applicable.Blank required fields indicate that the information was not provided, was deemed unavailable or was not applicable.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, gore, or its associates that the device, gore or its associates caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute a legal admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any defects or has malfunctioned, as defined from a legal standpoint.These words are included in the report and are fixed items for selection created by the fda, to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of reporting pursuant to part 803.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.
|
It was reported that two gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement was implanted on (b)(6) 2022 for an abdominal wall reconstruction with ileostomy.It was a complex procedure due to the size of the hernia and the fact that a loop of bowel was diverted through an artificial opening in the abdominal wall.A sandwich technique was used where the gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement was laid on the peritoneum with a prolene® soft polypropylene mesh (ethicon) on top.Patient was septic one week after the procedure.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient underwent a reintervention where both the gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement and the prolene® soft polypropylene mesh was explanted.The ileostomy perforation had filled the retrorectus space in small bowel content; but there was no intraperitoneal contamination.The gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement was reportedly in fragments.On (b)(6) 2022, a new gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement was implanted in the patient and by the end of the procedure the abdominal wall looked well.It was reported that it is unknown why bowel contents was found in the rectrorectus space after the original procedure it could be multifactorial.It could have been down to bowel injury or it could be mesh erosion unlikely to be from the gore® bio-a® tissue reinforcement.The patient stayed in the intensive care and received percutaneous drainage of the retrorectus space (serous culture was tested negative).The patient failure to progress and expired due to respiratory failure on (b)(6) 2022.
|