• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-650

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-650 Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-650L
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Perforation (2001)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Olympus reviewed the following literature titled "current status of esd for colorectal neoplastic lesions in our department kanazawa medical university, department of gastrointestinal endoscopy".In 2012, endoscopic submucosal dissection (esd) for colorectal early malignant tumors became covered by insurance, and 10 years have passed.Colorectal esd has a high risk of difficulty and complications due to anatomical factors such as the thinness of the intestinal wall, the narrowness of the sarcoma, and the presence of folds.There were 124 colorectal esd cases performed since april 2012, including 65 cancers, 38 highly atypical adenomas, 5 ssa/p, and 16 carcinoid cases.The en bloc resection rate was 81.5% (101/124), and the main reasons why en bloc resection was not possible were scarring in 7 cases, tumor protrusion into the appendiceal orifice or ileal valve in 5 cases, and difficulty continuing treatment due to peristalsis or body movements in 2 cases.Intraoperative perforation was observed in 3 cases, but was successfully closed endoscopically.Postoperative pathology revealed sm2 (the degree of invasion into the submucosa) or deeper in 11 patients, 9 of whom underwent additional surgery; only 1 patient had residual cancer, but no lymph node metastasis was found.Colorectal esd has a high degree of procedural difficulty and a high risk of accidental injury due to anatomical factors, but safety has improved due to improvements in devices and an increase in the number of experienced cases.[type of adverse events / number of patients] : intraoperative perforation 3 patients.There is no report of any olympus device malfunction in any procedure described in this study.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Since the literature described "dual knife", "kd-650l" was selected as a representative product with the largest number of shipments in the area and during the study period.In addition, the hook knife, it knife 2, and it knife nano mentioned in the article were devices used prior to 2010, and the article reported on cases performed after april 2012.Therefore, olympus is only reporting the dual knife introduced after 2010.The suspect device has not been returned to olympus for evaluation.The investigation is in process.Once the investigation has been completed, a supplemental report will be submitted with device evaluation results.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This supplemental report is being submitted to provided additional information from the author and to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.New information added to the following fields: b5 and h6.The device history record was unable to be reviewed for this device since no product malfunction was reported.However, olympus only releases products to market that meet all manufacturing specifications and final product release criteria.Based on the results of the investigation, it was presumed that the reported event is an accident or a complication associated with a surgical procedure using the subject device.There was no complaint reported on the subject device.There is no evidence of an olympus device malfunction.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Event Description
Additional information received from the author: in the medical opinion of the author, the olympus device did not cause malfunction nor the adverse events reported but were caused by the surgeon's technique.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE KD-650
Type of Device
SINGLE USE ELECTROSURGICAL KNIFE
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu hirose
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0-357
JA   036-0357
426422891
MDR Report Key15197756
MDR Text Key297581874
Report Number9614641-2022-00127
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170265761
UDI-Public04953170265761
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K092309
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 09/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-650L
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN(LITERATURE)
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received08/18/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
S-O CLIPS
Patient Outcome(s) Other; Required Intervention;
-
-