• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER WITH SHERLOCK; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740 POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER WITH SHERLOCK; CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS Back to Search Results
Model Number N/A
Device Problem Fluid/Blood Leak (1250)
Patient Problems Infiltration into Tissue (1931); Pain (1994); Swelling/ Edema (4577)
Event Date 07/26/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has not been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.A lot history review (lhr) of refy3823 showed no other similar product complaint(s) from this lot number.
 
Event Description
It was reported " patient had chemotherapy infusion and experienced pain and swelling above the insertion site on their right arm.Upon removal of picc, a hole was seen at the 10cm mark.".
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The manufacturer has received the sample and will evaluate.Results are expected soon.
 
Event Description
It was reported " patient had chemotherapy infusion and experienced pain and swelling above the insertion site on their right arm.Upon removal of picc, a hole was seen at the 10cm mark." additional information received on 08/25/2022: the patient had just started the infusion of lurbinectedin and the patient noted her arm was wet.Staff stopped the infusion and flushed the picc catheter with saline and noted some swelling in the arm and the dressing was saturated.The picc was removed and i noted the hole in the picc catheter.Patient had no pain in her arm and no treatment required.We reinserted another picc the next day.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H11: section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.The following were reviewed as part of this investigation: patient severity, trend analysis, applicable previous investigation(s), sample (if available), and applicable fmea documents.Based on a review of this information, the following was concluded: the complaint of a damaged catheter was confirmed.The product returned for evaluation was one 4fr s/l powerpicc solo catheter.The investigation findings are consistent with damage accumulated through flexural fatigue.Flexural fatigue occurs due to cyclic kinking of the catheter tube in which physiological, placement, usage, and mechanical factors may gradually form a crack(s) in the catheter.The returned product sample was evaluated and a split was observed at the 10cm depth marking.The catheter split contained physical features associated with material fatigue, and the characteristics observed which supported this type of failure included: damage which was circumferentially aligned.Fracture edges which were rounded and polished due to repeated material wear.'c' shaped impressions leading into the fracture site which are consistent with material buckling due to movement which caused the fracture edges to be pressed together overall elliptical shape to the fracture cross-section (a result of repeated kinking of the tubing).An examination of the catheter structure revealed no potential damage/defect related to manufacture of the product.H3 other text : evaluation findings are in section h.11.
 
Event Description
It was reported " patient had chemotherapy infusion and experienced pain and swelling above the insertion site on their right arm.Upon removal of picc, a hole was seen at the 10cm mark." additional information received 08/25/2022: the patient had just started the infusion of lurbinectedin and the patient noted her arm was wet.Staff stopped the infusion and flushed the picc catheter with saline and noted some swelling in the arm and the dressing was saturated.The picc was removed and i noted the hole in the picc catheter.Patient had no pain in her arm and no treatment required.We reinserted another picc the next day.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POWERPICC SOLO CATHETER WITH SHERLOCK
Type of Device
CATHETER,INTRAVASCULAR,THERAPEUTIC,LONG-TERM GREATER THAN 30 DAYS
Manufacturer (Section D)
C.R. BARD, INC. (BASD) -3006260740
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
Manufacturer (Section G)
BARD REYNOSA S.A. DE C.V. -9617592
blvd. montebello #1
parque industrial colonial
reynosa, tamaulipas 88780
MX   88780
Manufacturer Contact
becky garcia
605 north 5600 west
salt lake city 84116
8015950700
MDR Report Key15299375
MDR Text Key305416100
Report Number3006260740-2022-03322
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LJS
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeCA
PMA/PMN Number
K091324
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type User Facility
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/19/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/25/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date04/30/2023
Device Model NumberN/A
Device Catalogue Number2194108
Device Lot NumberREFY3823
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/19/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured11/01/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
-
-