• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INVIVE; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY PACEMAKER

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION INVIVE; CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY PACEMAKER Back to Search Results
Model Number V173
Device Problems Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Incorrect, Inadequate or Imprecise Result or Readings (1535)
Patient Problems Dizziness (2194); Syncope/Fainting (4411); No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/21/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p) was found to be in safety mode during a routine check.It was recommended that this device be replaced.No adverse patient effects were reported.The device remains in service and there is no evidence to suggest a device replacement procedure has been scheduled at this time.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected fields: e section (initial reporter) with physician information.(b)(6).
 
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p) was found to be in safety mode during a routine check.It was recommended that this device be replaced.No adverse patient effects were reported.The device remains in service and there is no evidence to suggest a device replacement procedure has been scheduled at this time.Additional information was received that this patient presented to urgent care due to experiencing symptoms of dizziness and syncope.Upon review of the patients most recent home monitoring reports, it was advised that the patient go to the hospital and undergo a generator change out procedure immediately as they are dependent.Subsequently, the patient went to the hospital where they were admitted.Once the device was interrogated, it was found due to unipolar programming while the device was in safety mode, oversensing and pacing inhibition were observed.Ultimately, the device was explanted and successfully replace.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device is expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Upon receipt at our post market quality assurance laboratory, this device was thoroughly inspected and analyzed.Interrogation of the device confirmed it was operating in safety mode due to system resets.It was confirmed that brady therapy remained available.The system resets occurred during a telemetry session and/or while communicating with the latitude remote monitoring system and caused the device to enter safety mode.Engineers determined that this device was demonstrating behavior consistent with a high internal cell impedance within the battery.The high internal impedance resulted in the system resets due to temporary high-power consumption related to telemetry attempts and subsequent reversion to safety mode operation.Boston scientific has issued a field safety notice regarding ingenio extended life (el) and cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p) devices that may exhibit this behavior.This particular device is included in the high impedance in ingenio extended life (el) pacemaker and crt-p advisory population.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemaker (crt-p) was found to be in safety mode during a routine check.It was recommended that this device be replaced.No adverse patient effects were reported.The device remains in service and there is no evidence to suggest a device replacement procedure has been scheduled at this time.Additional information was received that this patient presented to urgent care due to experiencing symptoms of dizziness and syncope.Upon review of the patients most recent home monitoring reports, it was advised that the patient go to the hospital and undergo a generator change out procedure immediately as they are dependent.Subsequently, the patient went to the hospital where they were admitted.Once the device was interrogated, it was found due to unipolar programming while the device was in safety mode, oversensing and pacing inhibition were observed.Ultimately, the device was explanted and successfully replace.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.This device is expected to be returned for analysis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
INVIVE
Type of Device
CARDIAC RESYNCHRONIZATION THERAPY PACEMAKER
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key15304030
MDR Text Key302259840
Report Number2124215-2022-32700
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NKE
UDI-Device Identifier00802526536632
UDI-Public00802526536632
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P030005/S079
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Remedial Action Notification
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 10/31/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/26/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date06/11/2016
Device Model NumberV173
Device Catalogue NumberV173
Device Lot Number106635
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received10/26/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/23/2014
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
Patient Age79 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-