• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V; SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD. SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V; SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME Back to Search Results
Model Number KD-V411M-0725
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 08/08/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device was returned to olympus for evaluation.Upon inspection testing of the returned device, the user's request was confirmed.It was discovered, the broken part was charred black and melted.When measured, the outer diameter of the knife wire, no abnormality was found.It was confirmed that the length of the knife wire and wire coating had no defects.No other abnormalities that could lead to breakage of the knife wire could be confirmed.The investigation is ongoing.If additional information becomes available, this report will be supplemented accordingly.The following medwatch reports are related: patient identifiers (b)(6) (kd-v411m-0725) and (b)(6) (kd-v411m-0725, this complaint).
 
Event Description
The customer reported to olympus, the single use 3-lumen sphincterotome v knife wire broke when it was energized immediately after use in a procedure.The same problem occurred with the replacement product.The procedure was completed with the third replacement which caused a 5-10 minute delay.There were no reports of patient harm associated with this event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
This report is being supplemented to provide additional information based on the legal manufacturer's final investigation.A review of the device history record found no deviations that could have caused or contributed to the reported issue.It has been less than 1 year since the subject device was manufactured.Based on the results of the investigation, although the exact cause could not be identified, a likely mechanism causing the broken cutting wire may be due to the following: 1.The cutting wire at a torn area of the coated portion came into contact with the distal end of the endoscope while the forceps elevator was raised.2.The output was activated in state of ¿1¿ description, and the cutting wire became hot instantly.This caused the cutting wire to break.In addition, it has been confirmed that the tear of the coated portion of the cutting wire could be duplicated by the following: 1.The forceps elevator of the endoscope was raised.2.When the cutting wire deflects, the coated portion of the cutting wire and the metal part of the distal end of the endoscope come into contact.3.In state of description ¿2¿, the cutting wire was moved back and forth.This caused the coated portion of the cutting wire to tear.The slider was pushed more than needed.This caused the cutting wire to deflect.The event can be detected/prevented by following the instructions for use (ifu) which state: ¿since the cutting wire is very thin, it may break off in the following cases: the distance between the papilla of vater and the cutting wire is very short, the output is too high or activated while the cutting wire touches metal parts of the endoscope, or the cutting wire is tightened too strong.When the cutting wire breaks off, its proximal end will be retracted toward the endoscope if the slider is pulled.If the slider is pushed, the cutting wire will be pushed out toward the papilla or move sideways.If the cutting wire breaks off, stop the output immediately and pull the slider completely to retract the broken cutting wire into the tube.Then withdraw the sphincterotome from the papilla.Otherwise, patient injury, such as perforations, bleeding, or lacerations within the biliary duct, and/or damage of the endoscope could result.¿ ¿when inserting the instrument into the endoscope, be sure that the cutting wire is parallel to the tube.Otherwise, the metal part of the forceps elevator may contact the cutting wire and peel off the coating material.¿ ¿do not activate output while tissue is in contact with the torn or damaged coated portion of the distal end.If output is activated while tissue is contacting the torn or damaged coated portion due to insertion into or withdrawal from an endoscope, leakage current, decreased output, and/or thermal injury could result.¿ ¿if you feel the cutting is blunt, withdraw the device from the scope to examine if there is any peel off and tear at the coating portion.¿ this supplemental report includes information added to d8 and g2.Olympus will continue to monitor field performance for this device.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SINGLE USE 3-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME V
Type of Device
SINGLE USE 2-LUMEN SPHINCTEROTOME
Manufacturer (Section D)
AOMORI OLYMPUS CO., LTD.
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0 357
JA  036-0357
Manufacturer Contact
masaharu hirose
2-248-1 okkonoki
kuroishi-shi, aomori 036-0-357
JA   036-0357
426422891
MDR Report Key15362458
MDR Text Key303642006
Report Number9614641-2022-00274
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KNS
UDI-Device Identifier04953170184031
UDI-Public04953170184031
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K950166
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other Health Care Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 10/06/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/06/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberKD-V411M-0725
Device Lot Number22K
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer08/24/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/12/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/14/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-