The reported event was confirmed manufacturing related.One sample was confirmed to exhibit the reported failure.The device had not met specifications.The product was not used for patient treatment.The product caused the reported failure.Visual evaluation of the returned sample noted one opened (with original packaging), bulb evacuator.Visual inspection of the sample noted a strand of hair inside of the evacuator bulb.The photo sample provided shows the strand of hair inside the bulb evacuator.This does not meet specification per inspection procedure which states "product and package (kit) must be free from visible loose or embedded foreign matter greater than an aggregate total of 0.6mm2 or 1/16¿ in length per tappi dirt estimation chart".A potential root cause for this failure mode could be ¿production areas not following cleaning procedure".The device history record was reviewed and found nothing that could have caused or contributed to the reported event.A labeling review was not performed because labelling could not have prevented the reported failure.H11:section a through f - the information provided by bd represents all of the known information at this time.Despite good faith efforts to obtain additional information, the complainant / reporter was unable or unwilling to provide any further patient, product, or procedural details to bd.H3 other text : the actual/suspected device was inspected.
|