• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED Back to Search Results
Model Number 9600TFX23A
Device Problem Calcified (1077)
Patient Problem Cardiogenic Shock (2262)
Event Date 08/31/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Investigation is ongoing.
 
Event Description
A report was received by edwards implant patient registry approximately 6 years post implant of a 29mm sapien 3 valve in the aortic position, the valve was explanted and a surgical valve was implanted.Medical records were reviewed and revealed the patient was admitted in cardiogenic shock, biventricular heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, with a failing sapien tavr related to severe aortic stenosis and severe aortic regurgitation.Angio was done and tandem heart was placed.Per medical records "the patient's valve was demolished, heavily calcified.She also had extensive aortic atheromatous disease around her coronary specifically." an emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) removal of sapien valve and surgical aortic valve replacement (savr) was performed.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Correction to section h6.The valve was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation.In addition, no relevant imagery was provided for review.A review of the risk management documentation was performed, and the reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of the failure mode is not required at this time.The complaint was confirmed from medical record.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.A review of the ifu revealed no deficiencies.An existing technical summary written by ew documents the root cause analysis on valve calcification over the time in patient.Per technical summary, calcific degeneration is a common cause of bioprosthetic heart valve failures.Many factors contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification.These include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.), mechanical stress related to the valve's hemodynamic performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Clinical results of thv implantation show similar mortality and significantly lower svd rate compared with surgical aortic valve replacement after 6 years of functioning.Though numerous studies have been conducted on preventive calcification strategies in bioprosthetic heart valves, the causes of calcification are not fully understood and there are still no mechanisms or medical therapies which fully prevent calcification from occurring in bioprosthetic valves.Furthermore, evaluation of reported complaints did not confirm any manufacturing non-conformances and identified that the proper manufacturing mitigations have been implemented.Additionally, per technical summary, no evidence of a product non-conformance or device malfunction were found in any of the valves returned for these complaints.As reported, ''approximately 6 years post implant of a 29mm sapien 3 valve in the aortic position, the valve was explanted and a surgical valve was implanted''.Medical records were reviewed and revealed the patient was admitted in cardiogenic shock, biventricular heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, with a failing sapien tavr related to severe aortic stenosis and severe aortic regurgitation.Angio was done and tandem heart was placed.According to the record ''the patient's valve was demolished, heavily calcified.She also had extensive aortic atheromatous disease around her coronary specifically.'' an emergency transcatheter aortic valve replacement (tavr) removal of sapien valve and surgical aortic valve replacement (savr) was performed.'' while a definitive root cause was unable to determine due to limited information provided, the technical summary indicates that valve calcification is likely related to patient factors.Since no manufacturing non-conformances or labeling/ifu/training deficiencies were identified, no product non-conformance was confirmed, and the complaint occurrence rate did not exceed the applicable trending control limit, no corrective/preventative actions nor product risk assessment (pra) escalation are required.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EDWARDS SAPIEN 3 TRANSCATHETER HEART VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIVERED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer (Section G)
EDWARDS LIFESCIENCES
1 edwards way
irvine CA 92614
Manufacturer Contact
renee van dorne
1 edwards way
irvine, CA 92614
9492506385
MDR Report Key15519901
MDR Text Key300990178
Report Number2015691-2022-08210
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
UDI-Device Identifier00690103194340
UDI-Public(01)00690103194340(17)170925
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P140031
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/10/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received09/30/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date09/25/2017
Device Model Number9600TFX23A
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received11/10/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured10/25/2016
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient SexFemale
-
-