Plant investigation: no parts were returned to the manufacturer for physical evaluation.Additionally, no on-site evaluation was performed by a fresenius field service technician (fst).A records review could not be performed as a serial number was not provided.The investigation into the cause of the reported problem was not able to be confirmed.A definitive conclusion regarding the complaint incident cannot be reached.Clinical investigation: a temporal relationship exists between hd therapy utilizing the 2008 machine, and the serious adverse event of fluid retention, which warranted hospitalization.The etiology of the fluid overload is unknown; therefore, causality cannot firmly be established.Given the anonymous reporting of the serious adverse event, an inability to obtain additional information precluded a more comprehensive investigation.Fluid retention is a well-known complication of the esrd disease process and is frequently caused by multiple factors.Based on the information available, the 2008 machine can be disassociated from the event(s).There is no allegation or objective evidence indicating a fresenius device(s) and/or product(s) deficiency or malfunction caused or contributed to the serious adverse event(s).Furthermore, it is unknown if the patient was utilizing a fresenius product(s) and/or device(s) when the serious adverse events occurred.
|