• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. POD PACKING COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYPODJ60
Device Problem Difficult or Delayed Separation (4044)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/08/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
This device is available for return.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the renal artery using ruby coils, pod packing coils (pod pcs), and a non-penumbra microcatheter.It should be noted that the patient's anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician attempted to advance the first ruby coil through its introducer sheath and reported that the coil would not advance at all past its initial position.Therefore, the ruby coil was removed.Next, one non-penumbra coil was implanted and three ruby coils were successfully implanted using the handle.After advancing a pod pc into the target location, the physician made several attempts to detach the coil using a ruby coil detachment handle (handle) without success.Upon removal of the pod pc, the coil detached in the microcatheter.It was reported that the pod pc was completely contained inside the microcatheter; therefore, the microcatheter containing the coil was removed from the patient and the pod pc was flushed out on the back table.The procedure was completed using four other coils and the same microcatheter.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned pod pc could not confirm the reported complaint.Evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated on the proximal end of the pusher assembly, the pull wire was retracted out of the ddt, and the embolization coil was detached.This type of damage indicates a successful detachment attempt.Based on the returned condition, the root cause of the reported complaint could not be determined.Penumbra products are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Section h.Box 6.Conclusions code 1: 4316 - the investigation findings do not lead to a clear conclusion about the root cause of the reported detachment issue.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
POD PACKING COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key15569908
MDR Text Key305288329
Report Number3005168196-2022-00464
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548017679
UDI-Public814548017679
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K170852
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/31/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYPODJ60
Device Lot NumberF111533
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received10/14/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured12/17/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-