• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG SL-PLUS STEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG SL-PLUS STEM; PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL Back to Search Results
Catalog Number UNKNOWN
Device Problem Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
Patient Problem Bone Fracture(s) (1870)
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that, on the literature review "mid-term results with the enhanced pressfit (epf) cup in osteoarthritis, chronic polyarthritis, and revision arthroplasty", during a tha index procedure in which a ep-fit plus and a sl-plus were implanted as the acetabular and femoral components respectively, thirteen (13) patients experienced an intraoperative fracture.Twelve (12) of them were associated to the trochanteric region and the remaining patient (1) sustained a diaphyseal fracture.Additional details regarding the measures taken to resolve all instances were not provided within the publication.No further information is available.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).Mid-term results with the enhanced pressfit (epf) cup in osteoarthritis, chronic polyarthritis, and revision arthroplasty.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: in the literature review "mid-term results with the enhanced pressfit (epf) cup in osteoarthritis, chronic polyarthritis, and revision arthroplasty" [1], following a total hip arthroplasty index procedure in which a ep-fit plus and a sl-plus were implanted as the acetabular and femoral components respectively, thirteen (13) patients experienced an intraoperative fracture.Twelve (12) of them were associated to the trochanteric region and the remaining patient (1) sustained a diaphyseal fracture.The complaint device, used in treatment, was not received for investigation and a visual inspection could not be performed.The exact part and batch number of the device is not known.Therefore, the batch record review could not be performed and it is not possible to investigate whether the reported devices met manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review was performed.The occurrence of the reported failure mode is within its expected risk level as per risk management.Furthermore, insufficient information was made available to determine the revision of instructions for use applicable to the device at the time of distribution.However, a review of current revision was conducted and the instructions for use lists several possible adverse effects resulting from a hip arthroplasty.A review of the risk management documentation verifies the failure mode, occurrence and severity of the reported issue.Due to insufficient information it is not possible to perform a review of past corrective actions.For the medical investigation, no relevant supporting clinical information could be provided.Therefore, a thorough clinical assessment cannot be performed at this time.The patient's current condition is unknown and the patient impact beyond the reported events could not be determined.Should any additional clinical information be provided, this complaint will be re-evaluated.Based on the performed investigations, a relationship between the reported devices and the reported incidents cannot be excluded, but the root cause of the problem stays undetermined due to insufficient information.A relationship between the reported event and the device cannot be confirmed.Due to insufficient information it is not possible to speculate about factors which could have contributed to the reported event.To date, no further actions will be taken.Smith and nephew will monitor the devices for further similar issues.[1]: doets hc, olsthoorn pgm, schmotzer h.Mittelfristige ergebnisse mit der enhanced pressfit (epf) pfanne bei arthrose, chronischer polyarthritis und bei der revisionsarthroplastik.In: pressfit pfannen (ed.: effenberger h, zichner l, richolt j) mcu 2004; 137- 142.Internal complaint reference (b)(4).
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SL-PLUS STEM
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, HIP, FEMORAL COMPONENT, CEMENTED, METAL
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau CH-50 00
SZ  CH-5000
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW ORTHOPAEDICS AG
schachenallee 29
aarau CH-50 00
SZ   CH-5000
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15626235
MDR Text Key301934334
Report Number9613369-2022-00579
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeNL
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Literature,Health Professional
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 11/09/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberUNKNOWN
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received11/06/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Hospitalization;
-
-