Device evaluated by manufacturer: the device was returned for analysis.The hub and shaft were visually inspected when returned.The renegade device severe buckling located from the hub to 36cm proximal.There was a fracture 36.5cm from the hub.The renegade devices product specification states the proximal od should be.0038+.0013 -.0026.The proximal end of the renegade that was returned was checked using a laser micrometer and measured.0386 which is in specification per the document.The distal end of the shaft measurement should be.0367+.0013 -.0026 and this device measured.0412 at the bond area of the shaft.The product must be compatible with (pass through uninhibitedly) 0.038" (0.97 mm) guidewire compatible guiding catheters (0.042" (1.1 mm) inside diameter).The device could not be inserted into an 5fr angiographic test catheter due to the severe damage on the shaft.Inspection of the remainder of the device, apart from the observed damage revealed no other damage or irregularities.The complaint was not confirmed for advancing issues; however, severe shaft damage was confirmed.
|
Reportable based on device analysis completed on 27sep2022.It was reported that the microcatheter could not be advance in the lesion.The target lesion was located in the liver.A 135/10 renegade hi flo kit catheter infusion was selected for use.During the procedure, the microcatheter was advanced through the catheter, however, it could not be advanced in the lesion.The catheter was replaced with a non-bsc 5frh catheter, but the microcatheter could not be advanced as well.The procedure was completed with another of the same device.There were no complications reported and the patient was stable post procedure.However, device analysis revealed that the device was fractured at 36.5ccm from the hub.
|