• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DCB00V
Device Problems Inaccurate Delivery (2339); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problems Hyphema (1911); Eye Pain (4467)
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
It was reported that bleeding had been observed in a patient¿s eye after the patient's complaining of pain during implantation of dcb00v.Bleeding was absorbed with irrigation/aspiration (ia), and the procedure was completed without problems.No haptics had been stretched out.However, it was noted that intraocular lens (iol) had unstably come out from its cartridge.The physician considered it could be lens-induced problem from the timing of bleeding.Nevertheless, there was no patient post-op injury.Through follow-up it was confirmed that the iol remains implanted.There was no incision enlargement, no vitrectomy and no sutures required.The patient outcome is good, vision intact.There was adhesion between two haptics of the lens.The doctor concluded that they do not consider the event to be an intraocular injury or intraocular bleeding.When the chip was advanced into the eye with ia, blood bubbled up in all cases, so doctor felt that it was bleeding from the inside of the eye.It is highly probable that the bleeding that occurred in the eye entered the eye and appeared to be bleeding.It was confirmed that there is no effect on eyesight.There was no cartridge tip damage reported.It was noted that the device was prepared and used accordingly with enough amount of ocular viscoelastic agent/healon and there was no resistance felt during extrusion of the lens.No other information was provided.This report captures the first event.Separate reports are being submitted for the addition two events.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Date of event: the exact date is unknown, the best estimate is prior to (b)(6) 2022.If explanted, give date: not applicable as lens remains implanted.Reporter phone number: (b)(6).This report is being filed on an international device; tecnis optiblue simplicity preloaded 1-piece iol, model dcb00v that has a similar device, tecnis simplicity preloaded 1-piece iol model dcb00 which is distributed in the unites states under pma p980040.The device was not returned for evaluation as it remains implanted; therefore, a failure analysis of the complaint device cannot be completed.As the serial number of the device is unknown no further investigation can be performed.If there is any relevant information received, a supplemental medwatch will be filed.Device manufacture date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.An attempt has been made to obtain missing information; however, the information has not been received.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: upon further review, per new information received it was noted by the doctor that the bleeding was probably not bleeding from the eye.The doctor determined that there was a high possibility that the blood flowed into the eye when the conjunctiva was incised and the blood returned to the eye.He doesn't consider it to be an intraocular injury or intraocular bleeding.He clarified that when the chip was advanced into the eye with irrigation/aspiration, blood bubbled up in all cases, so doctor felt that it was bleeding from the inside of the eye.It is highly probable that the bleeding that occurred in the eye entered and appeared to be bleeding.Since there is no effect on eyesight, jjsv complaint investigation is unnecessary for this event of bleeding.Therefore, there was no allegation on suspect product about the bleeding.Hence, "hyphema" was not indicated as a patient code.Therefore, this "code: 1911: hyphema" is being removed from section h6: health effect clinical code, as indicated in the initial report submitted.This report is being submitted to correct this info.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Corrected data: in review, because of new information excluding "hyphema" as a patient code, it is determined that only a malfunction occurred in this event and no serious injury.Therefore, this correction is submitted to correct this error.Fields below are updated: section b1: report type: product problem.Section h1: type of reportable event: malfunction.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15629875
MDR Text Key301979697
Report Number3012236936-2022-02549
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Public(01)
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,User Facility,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 11/04/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/18/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDCB00V
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-DCB00V
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/20/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Treatment
HEALON, MODEL AND LOT UNKNOWN
Patient Outcome(s) Other;
Patient EthnicityNon Hispanic
Patient RaceAsian
-
-