• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBY4C1035
Device Problems Material Deformation (2976); Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 09/21/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the femoral artery using ruby coils, a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern), and an angiographic catheter.It should be noted that the patient's anatomy was tortuous.During the procedure, the physician successfully implanted three ruby coils into the target location.While advancing the next ruby coil through the middle of the lantern, resistance was encountered, the coil became stuck, and the pusher assembly kinked.Upon retraction, the ruby coil stretched and unintentionally detached inside the lantern.Therefore, the lantern containing the detached ruby coil was removed.At this point, angiography showed that bleeding had stopped and the procedure was ended.There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed that the pusher assembly was fractured, and the pull wire was retracted at the fractured location.If the ruby coil is advanced against resistance at an extreme angle during use, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture on the pusher assembly may occur.If the pusher assembly is fractured and separated, the pull wire will retract from the pusher assembly ddt.This likely contributed to the embolization coil detachment during the procedure.The root cause of the resistance could not be determined.Evaluation also confirmed that the embolization coil had offset coil winds and introducer sheath was kinked near its proximal end.Based on the reported event, this damage likely occurred due to manipulation of the device against resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation revealed that the pet lock was separated, the pull tube was retracted, and the pusher assembly was kinked.This damage was likely incidental to the complaint.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.Placeholder.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key15650486
MDR Text Key307109515
Report Number3005168196-2022-00484
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00814548018669
UDI-Public814548018669
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeJA
PMA/PMN Number
K173614
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Health Professional,Distributor
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 01/01/2005,10/21/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received10/21/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBY4C1035
Device Lot NumberF112279
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/10/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received09/27/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured01/21/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-