This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Additional narrative: udi: (b)(4).To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the complaint device is not being returned, it was discarded, therefore unavailable for a physical evaluation.However, a photo was provided.Upon visual inspection of the photo, the implant appears to be perpendicular to the meniscus as opposed to parallel; therefore, this complaint can be confirmed.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device 9l22258, and no non-conformances were identified.The photo does not provide enough evidence to determine root cause.Without physical evaluation of the device reported, we cannot establish a root cause for the issue experienced by the customer.For the anchor of a truespan to seat it must turn after it leaves the insertion instrument and lay flat behind the meniscus, in this instance it remained upright which would not allow for it to seat.It could be that the anchor was deployed while not positioned behind the meniscus (within the meniscus) which would not enable the anchor to turn sideways and catch on the back-side as it is designed to.However, it cannot be conclusively affirmed.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to track any related complaints within this device family as a means of monitoring the extent with which this complaint is observed in the field.
|