Model Number 1516-20-507 |
Device Problem
Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993)
|
Patient Problems
Ossification (1428); Adhesion(s) (1695); Muscular Rigidity (1968); Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Synovitis (2094)
|
Event Date 07/08/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
Clinical notification received for revision due to pain and stiffness.Date of implant: (b)(6) 2021.Date of revision: (b)(6) 2022.(left side).Treatment: revision; insert was revised.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Depuy synthes is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which depuy synthes has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, depuy synthes or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy synthes, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Event Description
|
Surgeon notes that after the primary total knee arthroplasty that occurred in (b)(6) 2021, the patient developed stiffness, ankylosis, and arthrofibrosis.The patient underwent a closed manipulation under anesthesia in (b)(6) 2022.She redeveloped stiffness, pain, and limited range of motion as well as suprapatellar heterotopic bone.On (b)(6) 2022, the patient underwent an open arthrotomy, excision of heterotopic bone and lysis of adhesions manipulation.Prior to the arthrotomy on the same day, the patient received a dose of prophylactic radiation to prevent the regrowth of the heterotopic ossification.Upon opening the joint, dense scar tissue and synovitis were found.A radical synovectomy and excision of scar tissue were done.There was an extensive collar of heterotopic ossification involving the periosteum in the suprapatellar region extending from the condyles proximally for 6 cm.There was also early ossification of the periosteum near the intermuscular septae.A posterior capsulotomy was done and a direct vision lateral retinarcular release was also done.The insert was the only implant revised.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).This report is being submitted pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been investigated or verified prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the product, depuy synthes joint reconstruction, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.H10 additional narrative: if information is obtained that was not available for the initial report, a follow-up report will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Product complaint # (b)(4).Investigation summary: no device associated with this report was received for examination.The information received will be retained for potential series investigations if triggered by trend analysis, post market surveillance, or other events within the quality system.Depuy considers the investigation closed.Should additional information be received, the information will be reviewed and the investigation will be re-opened as necessary.Device history lot: the product investigation found no evidence suspecting an error in the manufacturing or material that would be a contributing factor in the reported allegation(s).A manufacturing records evaluation (mre) was not performed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|