It was reported to aesculap ag that a tc metzenbaum scissors cvd 180mm (part # bc263r) was used during a procedure performed on (b)(6) 2022.According to the complainant, during the procedure, the tip of the device broke off.An x-ray screening was performed to determine if the fragment detached into the patient, but nothing was found.The complaint device has been returned to the manufacturer for evaluation.An additional medical intervention was required.The adverse event / malfunction is filed under aag reference (b)(4).
|
Additional information/ correction: b6 - added relevant test.D9 - date of the product receipt.E1 - added end customer telephone number.H3 - device evaluated.H6 - codes updated.Investigation results: visual investigation: product was made available for investigation in decontaminated condition.The scissors are in a used condition.The end of the tip of the blade has broken off, the broken fragment is not available for examination.There are deposits on the surface that were most likely caused by reprocessing.The analysis of the fracture pattern revealed a forced fracture due to overload.No pores, inclusions or foreign bodies could be found at the fracture site.The fracture was most likely caused by levering or unsuitable material was processed with the scissors, which caused the tip to break.This is also supported by the fact that counter blade shows damage and pressure marks at the same height.This is likely to be in the same context.In order to obtain a more accurate examination result, the broken-off piece should also be provided for examination.Batch history review: due to the fact that no lot number was provided, a review of the device history records for the complained device is not possible.Review of the complaint history revealed that no similar complaints have been filed against products from this batch number.The review of risk assessment revealed that the overall risk level (severity 4(5) x probability 2(5) of occurrence) according to din en iso 14971 is still acceptable.Explanation and rationale: according to the quality standard, a material defect and a production defect can most likely be ruled out.There are no indications of previous damage or similar.We can rule out a manufacturing-related cause based on current analysis results.It is almost certain that a mechanical overload situation led to the breakage.Instruments with carbide inserts are sensitive to lateral loads such as torsional and lever forces or impacts.Since these scissors were not delivered in this condition because they do not comply with the aag standard, the cause can in all probability be found in the handling, but this cannot be clearly proven.The reason for the deviation cannot be determined.Conclusion and measures / preventive measures: based upon the investigation results a clear root cause conclusion cannot be drawn.There is no indication for a material-, manufacturing- or design-related failure.Based upon the investigations results a capa is not necessary.
|