• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: EXACTECH, INC. SMALL SUPERIOR AUGMENT GLENOID PLATE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

EXACTECH, INC. SMALL SUPERIOR AUGMENT GLENOID PLATE; PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED Back to Search Results
Model Number SMALL SUPERIOR AUGMENT GLENOID PLATE
Device Problem Device Dislodged or Dislocated (2923)
Patient Problem Appropriate Clinical Signs, Symptoms, Conditions Term / Code Not Available (4581)
Event Date 10/05/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Manufacturer Narrative
Concomitant medical products: (b)(4), 300-01-11 - equinoxe, humeral stem primary, press fit 11mm, (b)(4), 315-35-00 - glnd kwire, (b)(4), 320-10-00 - equinoxe reverse tray adapter plate tray +0, (b)(4), 320-15-05 - eq rev locking screw, (b)(4), 320-20-00 - eq reverse torque defining screw kit, (b)(4), 320-20-22 - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 22mm, (b)(4), 320-20-22 - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 22mm, (b)(4), 320-20-38 - eq rev compress screw lck cap kit, 4.5 x 38mm, (b)(4), 320-31-40 - glenosphere, 40mm, 320-40-03 humeral liner, 40mm, +2.5 7094722.Additional information, including the product investigation, will be submitted within 30 days of receipt.
 
Event Description
It was reported that a 71 yo female patient, initial left shoulder implanted on (b)(6) 2022, with no complications, ¿post op x-rays looked perfect¿, underwent a revision procedure on (b)(6) 2022.The x-rays showed that the implant had either rotated superiorly or migrated up.The doctor removed the liner, and then removed the glenosphere and all three screws from the baseplate.He then removed the superior baseplate and found that the top 1/3 superior/posterior had fractured resulting in the baseplate migrating superior.The doctor decided to switch to a tornier baseplate and used a 39 glenosphere.On the humoral side, the stem and +0 tray were well fixed so he trailed with a 40 +2.5 liner but wanted a little more constraint so went with a 40+2.5 liner.The patient was last known to be in stable condition following the event.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H6: based on review of all available information, there is no evidence to suggest that the reported event is related to any design or manufacturing issues.The cause of surgical revision due to scapular fracture cannot be conclusively determined; however, it is most likely related to the patient¿s underlying condition.These devices are used for treatment not diagnosis.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
SMALL SUPERIOR AUGMENT GLENOID PLATE
Type of Device
PROSTHESIS, SHOULDER, SEMI-CONSTRAINED, METAL/POLYMER CEMENTED
Manufacturer (Section D)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer (Section G)
EXACTECH, INC.
2320 nw 66 court
gainesville FL 32653
Manufacturer Contact
kate jacobson
3523771140
MDR Report Key15729741
MDR Text Key303047079
Report Number1038671-2022-01401
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code KWS
UDI-Device Identifier10885862534873
UDI-Public10885862534873
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K180632
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 02/27/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/04/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberSMALL SUPERIOR AUGMENT GLENOID PLATE
Device Catalogue Number320-35-02
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer10/11/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received02/02/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured07/20/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention;
Patient Age71 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-