• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ACCOLADE MRI EL DR; IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT) Back to Search Results
Model Number L331
Device Problems Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Under-Sensing (1661)
Patient Problem Chest Pain (1776)
Event Date 02/06/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this patient with this pacemaker was seeking recommendation for optimal rate response settings for this device.This patient is a very active person with their primary activity being long swimming.Technical services (ts) recommended a discussion with this patients physician for programming optimization.This patients pacemaker was reprogrammed approximately 2 months later as it was claimed that this patients heart rate (hr) was not rising high enough.Months later, this patient was still experiencing issues with their hr dropping while swimming.Ts recommended disk analysis to review the sensor data.It was noted that this patient experienced chest tension when their hr was too low or too high.Ts discussed this patient obtaining an interrogation with the local field representative and clinic.It was noted that this patient was really frustrated with the lack of ability to swim as they used to.Disk analysis has been requested and is still pending.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this patient with this pacemaker was seeking recommendation for optimal rate response settings for this device.This patient is a very active person with their primary activity being long swimming.Technical services (ts) recommended a discussion with this patients physician for programming optimization.This patients pacemaker was reprogrammed approximately 2 months later as it was claimed that this patients heart rate (hr) was not rising high enough.Months later, this patient was still experiencing issues with their hr dropping while swimming.Ts recommended disk analysis to review the sensor data.It was noted that this patient experienced chest tension when their hr was too low or too high.Ts discussed this patient obtaining an interrogation with the local field representative and clinic.It was noted that this patient was really frustrated with the lack of ability to swim as they used to.Disk analysis has been requested and is still pending.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that this patient underwent additional exercises in which ts observed what was believed to be some rare over and undersensing.Disk analysis was sent in and will be analyzed.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Event Description
It was reported that this patient with this pacemaker was seeking recommendation for optimal rate response settings for this device.This patient is a very active person with their primary activity being long swimming.Technical services (ts) recommended a discussion with this patients physician for programming optimization.This patients pacemaker was reprogrammed approximately 2 months later as it was claimed that this patients heart rate (hr) was not rising high enough.Months later, this patient was still experiencing issues with their hr dropping while swimming.Ts recommended disk analysis to review the sensor data.It was noted that this patient experienced chest tension when their hr was too low or too high.Ts discussed this patient obtaining an interrogation with the local field representative and clinic.It was noted that this patient was really frustrated with the lack of ability to swim as they used to.Disk analysis has been requested and is still pending.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that this patient underwent additional exercises in which ts observed what was believed to be some rare over and undersensing.Disk analysis was sent in and will be analyzed.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Analysis revealed that the minute ventilation (mv) sensor is picking up impedance changes due to this device and lead movement when this patient moves his left arm in a swimming motion.The frequency of the mv signal matches the arm motion frequency, not the frequency of respirations.This patient is a swimmer and this is the source of the inappropriate mv response.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
ACCOLADE MRI EL DR
Type of Device
IMPLANTABLE PULSE GENERATOR, PACEMAKER (NON-CRT)
Manufacturer (Section D)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul MN 55112
Manufacturer (Section G)
BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION
cashel road
clonmel
EI  
Manufacturer Contact
timothy degroot
4100 hamline avenue north
saint paul, MN 55112
6515826168
MDR Report Key15772776
MDR Text Key307284483
Report Number2124215-2022-46560
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code LWP
UDI-Device Identifier00802526559266
UDI-Public00802526559266
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P150012/S000
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Consumer
Reporter Occupation Non-Healthcare Professional
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 02/24/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/10/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device Expiration Date12/23/2022
Device Model NumberL331
Device Catalogue NumberL331
Device Lot Number915879
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Date Manufacturer Received02/15/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured01/11/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age73 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-