Model Number L331 |
Device Problems
Over-Sensing (1438); Pacing Problem (1439); Under-Sensing (1661)
|
Patient Problem
Chest Pain (1776)
|
Event Date 02/06/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient with this pacemaker was seeking recommendation for optimal rate response settings for this device.This patient is a very active person with their primary activity being long swimming.Technical services (ts) recommended a discussion with this patients physician for programming optimization.This patients pacemaker was reprogrammed approximately 2 months later as it was claimed that this patients heart rate (hr) was not rising high enough.Months later, this patient was still experiencing issues with their hr dropping while swimming.Ts recommended disk analysis to review the sensor data.It was noted that this patient experienced chest tension when their hr was too low or too high.Ts discussed this patient obtaining an interrogation with the local field representative and clinic.It was noted that this patient was really frustrated with the lack of ability to swim as they used to.Disk analysis has been requested and is still pending.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient with this pacemaker was seeking recommendation for optimal rate response settings for this device.This patient is a very active person with their primary activity being long swimming.Technical services (ts) recommended a discussion with this patients physician for programming optimization.This patients pacemaker was reprogrammed approximately 2 months later as it was claimed that this patients heart rate (hr) was not rising high enough.Months later, this patient was still experiencing issues with their hr dropping while swimming.Ts recommended disk analysis to review the sensor data.It was noted that this patient experienced chest tension when their hr was too low or too high.Ts discussed this patient obtaining an interrogation with the local field representative and clinic.It was noted that this patient was really frustrated with the lack of ability to swim as they used to.Disk analysis has been requested and is still pending.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that this patient underwent additional exercises in which ts observed what was believed to be some rare over and undersensing.Disk analysis was sent in and will be analyzed.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.
|
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that this patient with this pacemaker was seeking recommendation for optimal rate response settings for this device.This patient is a very active person with their primary activity being long swimming.Technical services (ts) recommended a discussion with this patients physician for programming optimization.This patients pacemaker was reprogrammed approximately 2 months later as it was claimed that this patients heart rate (hr) was not rising high enough.Months later, this patient was still experiencing issues with their hr dropping while swimming.Ts recommended disk analysis to review the sensor data.It was noted that this patient experienced chest tension when their hr was too low or too high.Ts discussed this patient obtaining an interrogation with the local field representative and clinic.It was noted that this patient was really frustrated with the lack of ability to swim as they used to.Disk analysis has been requested and is still pending.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Additional information was received that this patient underwent additional exercises in which ts observed what was believed to be some rare over and undersensing.Disk analysis was sent in and will be analyzed.This pacemaker remains in service.No adverse patient effects were reported.Analysis revealed that the minute ventilation (mv) sensor is picking up impedance changes due to this device and lead movement when this patient moves his left arm in a swimming motion.The frequency of the mv signal matches the arm motion frequency, not the frequency of respirations.This patient is a swimmer and this is the source of the inappropriate mv response.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|