• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

PENUMBRA, INC. RUBY COIL LP; HCG, KRD Back to Search Results
Catalog Number RBYLP0415
Device Problems Failure to Advance (2524); Premature Separation (4045)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/20/2022
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
The device has been returned and the investigation results are pending.A follow up mdr will be submitted upon completion of the device investigation.
 
Event Description
The patient was undergoing a coil embolization procedure in the gastroduodenal artery (gda) using ruby coil lps and a non-penumbra microcatheter.During the procedure, the physician was unable to advance a ruby coil lp through the distal end of the microcatheter and into the target vessel.Therefore, the ruby coil lp was removed.The physician then attempted to advance a new ruby coil lp into the vessel; however, the same issue occurred.Consequently, the physician was manipulating the ruby coil lp when the coil unintentionally detached inside the microcatheter.Therefore, the physician used saline to push the detached ruby coil lp into the vessel.Subsequently, the physician advanced the next ruby coil lp, but the coil would not advance past the distal end of the microcatheter again; therefore, both the ruby coil lp and microcatheter was removed.The procedure was completed using ruby coils and a lantern delivery microcatheter (lantern).There was no report of an adverse effect to the patient.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Evaluation of the returned ruby coil lp pusher assembly confirmed that the embolization coil was detached.Evaluation revealed a fracture on the pusher assembly.If the ruby coil lp is manipulated against resistance during use, damage such as a kink and subsequent fracture on the pusher assembly may occur.This damage likely contributed to the embolization coil detachment.The damage observed on the returned non-penumbra microcatheter likely contributed to the resistance during the procedure.Further evaluation of the device revealed kinks throughout the pusher assembly.Based on the returned condition, this damage was likely incidental to the complaint and likely occurred during packaging for the device return.Penumbra coils are visually inspected during in-process inspection and during quality inspection after manufacturing.The manufacturing records for this lot were reviewed and did not reveal any outstanding discrepancies, design, or quality concerns.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
RUBY COIL LP
Type of Device
HCG, KRD
Manufacturer (Section D)
PENUMBRA, INC.
one penumbra place
alameda CA 94502
Manufacturer Contact
veronica farris
one penumbra place
alameda, CA 94502
5107483200
MDR Report Key15794451
MDR Text Key305289198
Report Number3005168196-2022-00524
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
UDI-Device Identifier00815948021815
UDI-Public815948021815
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
K192955
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 01/01/2005,12/13/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/14/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue NumberRBYLP0415
Device Lot NumberF113018
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer11/10/2022
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? Yes
Date Report Sent to FDA01/01/2005
Date Report to Manufacturer01/10/2005
Date Manufacturer Received11/17/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured02/17/2022
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Age67 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-