• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC. TECNIS SIMPLICITY; INTRAOCULAR LENS Back to Search Results
Model Number DIB00
Device Problem Physical Resistance/Sticking (4012)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Type  malfunction  
Manufacturer Narrative
Age, weight, ethnicity: information unknown/not provided.Date of event: unknown/not provided.Catalog number: a complete catalog number is unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Serial number: unknown, as information was not provided.Expiration date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Udi number: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.If implanted; give date: unknown/not provided.If explanted; give date: n/a (not applicable).The lens remains implanted.Device manufacture date: unknown, as the serial number was not provided.Device evaluation: the device was not returned at the manufacturing site; therefore, product testing could not be performed and the customer¿s reported complaint could not be verified.Manufacturing record review: the manufacturing record could not be reviewed since the serial number was not provided.Conclusion: the complaint product was not returned, and serial number is unknown, it is not possible to determine a malfunction and/or product quality deficiency.Attempts have been made to obtain missing information; however, the account did not have the information.All pertinent information available to johnson & johnson surgical vision, inc.Has been submitted.
 
Event Description
It was reported that an intraocular lens (iol) haptic was sticking when loading.Through follow-up, it was learned there were two dib00s where haptics were sticking, but they were able to implant the lenses.It was not known what the haptics were sticking to.Through further follow-up, it was learned that there are about 10-15 of the dib00 iols.The exact number of iols or serial numbers are unknown.The scrub technicians said the haptics were sticking together, almost like they are holding hands.This was noticed once the iol has been inserted into the patients operative eye.The surgeon then unsticks them with something like a utrada and the iol remains implanted in the patients eye.There were no unplanned sutures/vitrectomies/enlarged incisions required.No patient injuries have been reported.The products are not available for return as they were implanted into the patients eye.No other information is available.This report is for the approximate 10-15 dib00s implanted where exact number of iols and serial numbers were unknown.Separate reports are being submitted for the other dib00 models.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TECNIS SIMPLICITY
Type of Device
INTRAOCULAR LENS
Manufacturer (Section D)
AMO PUERTO RICO MFG. INC.
road 402 north, anasco ind. pk
anasco PR 00610
Manufacturer Contact
somyata nagpal
31 technology drive
irvine, CA 92618
7142478552
MDR Report Key15794991
MDR Text Key307908463
Report Number3012236936-2022-02846
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HQL
UDI-Public(01)
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeUS
PMA/PMN Number
P980040
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Health Professional,User Facility
Reporter Occupation Nurse
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 11/14/2022
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/14/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? No
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberDIB00
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-DIB00
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received10/25/2022
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
-
-