• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 3.5 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. TWINFIX TI 3.5 ULTRABRAID; STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE Back to Search Results
Model Number 72200752
Device Problem Break (1069)
Patient Problem No Clinical Signs, Symptoms or Conditions (4582)
Event Date 10/27/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
It was reported that during an acl, after impacting a twinfix ultrabraid anchor in the bone and fixing the anchor, as well as the resistance of the bone; the anchor broke, and was removed using a pair of plier.Surgery resumed without any delay, with a back-up device.Patient´s health condition is stable.No further complications were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference: (b)(4).
 
Manufacturer Narrative
H3, h6: the reported device was not returned to the designated complaint unit for independent evaluation, thus visual inspection and functional testing could not be performed.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the raw material found that no burrs, cracks, or contamination is allowed.A certification of compliance to material and processing specifications is required.A clinical review states the procedure was completed using a back-up device.No patient injuries or adverse consequences were reported.Since no patient injuries are being reported no further clinical/medical assessment is warranted at this time.There was no relationship found between the device and the reported event.The complaint was not confirmed.Please refer to the instructions for use for recommendations on proper use of the device and potential troubleshooting methods to prevent future reoccurrence of the reported event.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.If the product associated with this event is returned at a future date, this investigation will be reopened for evaluation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Internal complaint reference (b)(4).The reported device was received for evaluation.A visual inspection of the returned device found that it is not in its original packaging.The insertion device, fractured anchor, broken blue white suture string and intact white suture string were returned with debris on them.The anchor is fractured at the proximal end, where the suture window was.The blue white suture is broken roughly in half and the ends are frayed.Based on the condition of the product material found during visual inspection, it was determined the device damage was caused by the application of improper/excessive force.Additional material testing is not required.A review of device records showed there were no indications to suggest that the product did not meet manufacturing specifications upon release for distribution.A complaint history review found similar reported events.The instructions for use were reviewed and found to include conditions of off label use and technique specifics, as well as precautions and warnings related to the use of the device.A risk management review found that the reported failure and/or harm was documented appropriately, and there were no indications to suggest the anticipated risk is not adequate.A review of the raw material found that no burrs, cracks, or contamination is allowed.A certification of compliance to material and processing specifications is required.The root cause has been associated with unintended use of the device.Factors that could have contributed to the failure include excessive force on the device, excessive torque on the device, attempted correction of a damaged device, off-axis insertion, improper preparation of the insertion site, or an inadvertent impact event inconsistent with normal use.No containment or corrective actions are recommended at this time.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
TWINFIX TI 3.5 ULTRABRAID
Type of Device
STAPLE, FIXATION, BONE
Manufacturer (Section D)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer (Section G)
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.
130 forbes blvd.
mansfield MA 02048
Manufacturer Contact
holly topping
7000 west william cannon drive
austin, TX 78735
5123913905
MDR Report Key15813171
MDR Text Key303796989
Report Number1219602-2022-01752
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code JDR
UDI-Device Identifier03596010578921
UDI-Public03596010578921
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
K972326
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other,Foreign,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 09/13/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received11/17/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model Number72200752
Device Catalogue Number72200752
Device Lot Number2074047
Was Device Available for Evaluation? Device Returned to Manufacturer
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received09/11/2023
Was Device Evaluated by Manufacturer? Device Not Returned to Manufacturer
Date Device Manufactured06/01/2021
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Required Intervention; Other;
Patient Age33 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-