Corrected information: section h6.Additional information: section h10.Per the instructions for use (ifu), structural valve deterioration (wear, fracture, calcification, leaflet tear/tearing from the stent posts, leaflet retraction, suture line disruption of components of a prosthetic valve, thickening, stenosis), and device degeneration are listed in the instructions for use for the thv procedure and are known potential risks associated with the device.Structural valve deterioration (svd) may be manifested as stenosis with thickened leaflets.Svd refers to changes intrinsic to the valve and can include failure modes such as wear, calcification, leaflet tear, stent creep, leaflet disruption, or leaflet retraction.Svd may be mild and not require any intervention or it may be moderate to severe.It can cause the heart to work harder to eject blood from the ventricle.Depending on the severity it could be an indication for valve replacement or medical intervention.Tissue calcification is a very common failure mode.The mechanisms for bioprosthetic heart valve tissue calcification are not yet fully understood.Many factors can contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification including patient-related (e.G.Patient age, disease state, immune status, and other co-morbidities), pharmacological, and intrinsic properties of the valve itself.It is widely understood that patients with chronic renal disease and prior history of calcific stenosis of the native valve may be predisposed to bioprosthetic calcification.The sapien 3 valve was not returned to edwards lifesciences for evaluation as it remains implanted in the patient.Without the device, visual inspection, functional testing and dimensional analysis could not be performed.Review of the provided 3mensio report revealed calcification on the valve leaflets.A device history review (dhr) review and lot history review were not performed as there were no allegations of a malfunction related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.In this case, the complaint for 'svd - calcification' was confirmed based on provided imagery.The reported event does not allege a malfunction that could be related to an edwards manufacturing deficiency.A review of the ifu and training manuals revealed no deficiencies.An existing technical summary written by edwards lifesciences documents the root cause analysis on valve calcification over the time in patient.Per the technical summary, calcific degeneration is a common cause of bioprosthetic heart valve failures.Many factors contribute to the onset and propagation of calcification.These include patient factors (age, disease state, pharmacological intervention, etc.), mechanical stress related to the valve's hemodynamic performance, and glutaraldehyde fixation of tissue.Edwards' thv valves undergo thermafix tissue processing, which is a heat treatment process used to reduce calcification variability and lower calcification levels in comparison to xenologix process.Clinical results of thv implantation show similar mortality and significantly lower svd rate compared with surgical aortic valve replacement after 6 years of functioning.Though numerous studies have been conducted on preventive calcification strategies in bioprosthetic heart valves, the causes of calcification are not fully understood and there are still no mechanisms or medical therapies which fully prevent calcification from occurring in bioprosthetic valves.Furthermore, evaluation of reported complaints for 'calcification' and 'svd - calcification' did not confirm any manufacturing non-conformances and identified that the proper manufacturing mitigations have been implemented.Additionally, per the technical summary, no evidence of a product non-conformance or device malfunction were found in any of the valves returned for these complaints.Due to limited information, a definitive root cause was not able to be determined.Patient conditions may have contributed to the valve calcification.In this case, there was no allegation or indication a product malfunction contributed to this adverse event.Investigation results suggest patient factors may have caused or contributed to this event.A review of edwards lifesciences risk management documentation was performed for this case.The reported event is an anticipated risk of the transcatheter heart valve procedure, additional assessment of this adverse event is not required at this time.The ifu and training manuals have been reviewed and no inadequacies have been identified with regards to warnings, contraindications, and the directions/conditions for the successful use of the device.Complaint histories for all reported events are reviewed against trending control limits monthly, and any excursions above the control limits are assessed and documented as part of this monthly review.No corrective or preventative actions are required.
|