The age of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.The gender of the majority of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.It was not possible to ascertain specific device information from the article or to match the events reported with previously reported events.Correspondence has been sent to the author of the article inquiring about individual patient information and additional information regarding the reported events.Section d information references the main component of the system.Other relevant device(s) are: product id: neu_unknown_lead, serial/lot #: unknown, ubd: , udi#: medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
|
Zampogna, a., cavallieri, f., bove, f. et al. axial impairment and falls in parkinson¿s disease: 15 years of subthalamic deep brain stimulation. npj parkinsons dis. 8, 121 (2022).Https://doi.Org/10.1038/s41531-022-00383-y summary: in this retrospective study, we longitudinally analyzed axial impairment and falls in people with parkinson¿s disease (pd) and subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (stn-dbs).Axial scores and falling frequency were examined at baseline, and 1, 10, and 15 years after surgery.Preoperative demographic and clinical data, including pd duration and severity, phenotype, motor and cognitive scales, medications, and vascular changes on neuroimaging were examined as possible risk factors through kaplan¿meier and cox regression analyses.Of 302 individuals examined before and at 1 year after surgery, 102 and 57 were available also at 10 and 15 years of follow-up, respectively.Axial scores were similar at baseline and at 1 year but worsened at 10 and 15 years.The prevalence rate of frequent fallers progressively increased from baseline to 15 years.Preoperative axial scores, frontal dysfunction and age at pd onset were risk factors for axial impairment progression after surgery.Axial scores, akinetic/rigid phenotype, age at disease onset and disease duration at surgery predicted frequent falls.Overall, axial signs progressively worsened over the long-term period following stn-dbs, likely related to the progression of pd, especially in a subgroup of subjects with specific risk factors.Reported events: 1.Subjects with electrode misplacement (i.E.Suboptimal electrode location requiring lead revision) were excluded from this study.
|