SMITH & NEPHEW, INC. GNS II BICONVEX PAT 23MM; PROSTHESIS, KNEE, PATELLOFEMOROTIBIAL, SEMI-CONSTRAIN, CEMENT, POLY/MET/POLY
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 71420566 |
Device Problem
Unintended Collision (1429)
|
Patient Problems
Pain (1994); Loss of Range of Motion (2032); Implant Pain (4561)
|
Event Date 10/28/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Event Description
|
It was reported that, after primary tka surgery performed on (b)(6) 2022, the patient complaint about pain and loss of range of motion one week later.It was found that the gns ii biconvex pat 23mm was impinged to the femoral component during knee bending and stretching.The issue was solved performing a revision surgery on (b)(6) 2022, to exchange the patella component for a resurfacing patella.Patient current health status is unknown.All available information has been disclosed.If additional information should become available, a supplemental report will be submitted accordingly.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Smith & nephew is submitting this report pursuant to the provisions of 21 c.F.R.Part 803.This report may be based upon information which smith & nephew has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by fda, smith & nephew, or its employees, that the report constitutes an admission that the device, smith & nephew or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.(b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
H3, h6: the device was not returned for evaluation but the video was reviewed, and the impingement is confirmed.The clinical/medical investigation concluded that, based on the imaging provided, the reported patellar/femoral impingement during flexion and extension led to the revision; however, the primary component selection could not be ruled out as a contributing factor.The patient impact included the impingement, pain, loss of range of motion, imaging, and subsequent patellar revision.Further patient impact could not be determined.No further medical assessment can be rendered at this time.A review of the production order did not reveal a manufacturing abnormality that could have caused or contributed to the reported incident.A review of complaint history for the part number over the past 12 months and for the batch number based on historical data of the device did not reveal similar events for the listed device.A review of the instructions for use documents for knee systems revealed that decreased range of motion can result from improper implant selection, improper implant positioning, improper fixation, and/or migration of the components.Muscle and fibrous tissue laxity can also contribute to this condition, this has been identified as possible adverse effects.A review of the risk management file revealed this failure mode was previously identified.The anticipated risk level is still adequate.A historical review concluded that there are no prior actions related to this product and event.At this time, we have no reason to suspect that the product failed to meet any product specifications at the time of manufacture.Factors that could contribute to the reported event include alignment, joint tightness, patient condition, postoperative care or size selected of the device used.The contribution of the device to the reported event could not be corroborated.Based on this investigation, the need for corrective action is not indicated.Without the return of the actual product involved, our investigation could not proceed.Should the device or additional information be received, the complaint will be reopened.No further investigation is warranted for this complaint; however, we will continue to monitor for future complaints and investigate as necessary.We consider this investigation closed.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|