APPLIED MEDICAL RESOURCES EB217, VOYANT MARYLAND FUSION 23CM, 6/BX; ELECTROSURGICAL, CUTTING & COAGULATION & ACCESSORIES
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number EB217 |
Device Problem
Energy Output Problem (1431)
|
Patient Problem
Superficial (First Degree) Burn (2685)
|
Event Date 11/08/2022 |
Event Type
Injury
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
No product is being returned to applied medical for evaluation.A follow-up report will be provided upon completion of investigation.
|
|
Event Description
|
Procedure performed: wide local excision event description: it was noticed during the case that there was a significant red marks (potential burn) to the skin next to the incision under the armpit and another significant red marks (potential burn on the areola next to the incision.The surgeon made sure that the voyant jaws / metal section between jaws and plastic shaft were not in contact with this section of skin at any point during the case.The only part of the voyant device that came into contact with the skin was the plastic shaft.They were taking the sentinel nodes at the time the mark was seen additional information received via email from territory manager on (b)(6) 2022: there were two marks noticed, one on the areola next to the incision roughly 4mm wide x 8mm long and one next to the incision in the armpit roughly 4mm wide x 8mm long additional information provided by territory manager via email (b)(6) 2022: i spoke with [surgeon] and the patient is fine, nothing further needed to do done, as the burns were superficially and healed naturally.Intervention: nothing further needed to be done, as the burns were superficially and healed naturally.Patient status: patient is fine.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The event unit was not returned to applied medical for evaluation.As the event unit was not returned, applied medical is unable to determine if the event unit exhibited any non-conformances that could have contributed to the reported event.In the absence of the event unit, it is difficult to determine if the reported event was caused by a manufacturing non-conformance or circumstantial factors at the time of use.Applied medical has reviewed the details surrounding the event and is unable to determine the exact root cause of the event.
|
|
Event Description
|
Procedure performed: wide local excision.Event description: it was noticed during the case that there was a significant red marks (potential burn) to the skin next to the incision under the armpit and another significant red marks (potential burn on the areola next to the incision.The surgeon made sure that the voyant jaws / metal section between jaws and plastic shaft were not in contact with this section of skin at any point during the case.The only part of the voyant device that came into contact with the skin was the plastic shaft.They were taking the sentinel nodes at the time the mark was seen.Additional information received via email from territory manager on 10nov2022: there were two marks noticed, one on the areola next to the incision roughly 4mm wide x 8mm long and one next to the incision in the armpit roughly 4mm wide x 8mm long.Additional information provided by territory manager via email 25nov22: i spoke with [health professional] and the patient is fine, nothing further needed to do done, as the burns were superficially and healed naturally.Intervention: nothing further needed to be done, as the burns were superficially and healed naturally.Patient status: patient is fine.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|