MEDOS INTERNATIONAL SARL TRUESPAN MENISCAL REPAIR SYSTEM PEEK 24 DEGREE; SOFT-TISSUE ANCHOR, BIOABSORBABLE
|
Back to Search Results |
|
Model Number 228152 |
Device Problems
Break (1069); Device-Device Incompatibility (2919)
|
Patient Problems
Foreign Body In Patient (2687); Unspecified Tissue Injury (4559)
|
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Udi: (b)(4).Reporter is a j&j employee.To date the device has not been returned.If the device or further details are received at a later date a supplemental medwatch will be sent.
|
|
Event Description
|
This is report 1 of 2 for (b)(4).It was reported by the affiliate in poland that during an unknown surgery on an unknown date, it was observed that two truespan meniscal repair system peek 24 degree devices failed.According to the report, the first one device remained partially in the metal sleeve while the feeding part on the second one was damaged.It was reported that the plastic and metal sleeves remained in the patient's knee joint.The procedure was extended for a minimum of 30 minutes with a minor damage to the patient's articular cartilage.There were no adverse patient consequences reported.The status of the patient was unknown.No additional information was provided.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by depuy mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, depuy mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.D9, h3, h6: the actual device has been returned and is currently pending evaluation.Once reliability engineering evaluates the device, a supplemental medwatch report will be sent accordingly.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
This report is being submitted in pursuant to the provisions of 21 cfr, part 803.This report may be based on information which has not been able to investigate or verify prior to the required reporting date.This report does not reflect a conclusion by mitek or its employees that the report constitutes an admission that the device, mitek, or its employees caused or contributed to the potential event described in this report.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Device was used for treatment, not diagnosis.If information is obtained that was not available for the initial medwatch, a follow-up medwatch will be filed as appropriate.Investigation summary: the product was returned to mitek for evaluation.Mitek then conducted visual inspection and functional test of device received.The complaint device was received and evaluated.Upon visual inspection, it was observed that the needle was not attached in the device and it was not returned, the sleeve and both plates were not returned including the suture.Due to the condition of the device it was not possible to test the trigger.A manufacturing record evaluation was performed for the finished device and no non-conformances were identified.As part of depuy synthes mitek quality process all devices are manufactured, inspected, and released to approved specifications.According with the visual inspection, this complaint can be confirmed.A possible root cause can be attributed to procedural variables, such handling of the device or product interaction during procedure; an excessive manipulation of the device, tilting movements of the device while it was inserted causing the needle and the sleeve to be deformed and therefore a mechanical detachment of the needle and the sleeve at the moment when the first plate was going to be deployed, however, this cannot be conclusively determined.At this point in time, no corrective action is required, and no further action is warranted.However, depuy synthes mitek will continue to monitor additional complaint information for potential safety signals through complaint trending as part of post market surveillance.
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|