• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV Back to Search Results
Model Number EVOLUTR-29
Device Problems Break (1069); Material Split, Cut or Torn (4008)
Patient Problems Cusp Tear (2656); Valvular Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4449); Aortic Valve Insufficiency/ Regurgitation (4450)
Event Date 11/30/2022
Event Type  Injury  
Event Description
Medtronic received information that approximately five years following the implant of this transcatheter bioprosthetic valve, the patient presented and was admitted with severe aortic insufficiency (ai).An echocardiogram was performed and upon examination, the ai was due to breakage of the bioprosthetic leaflet.Subsequently, nearly one month after admission, the patient underwent a successful valve replacement and a second medtronic transcatheter aortic valve was implanted.No additional adverse patient effects were reported.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Product analysis: the device remains implanted and no procedural images were submitted for review; therefore, no product analysis can be performed.Conclusion: without the return of the product, no definitive conclusion can be made regarding the clinical observation.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Updated b5.Updated h6.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Additional information was received which confirmed that the "breakage" of the leaflet referred to a leaflet rupture, causing valve failure.The severe ai was classified as central regurgitation.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Conclusion: the device history record was reviewed and showed that this product met all manufacturing specifications for product released for distribution.No issues were identified that would have impacted this event.Regurgitation can be caused by a variety of factors, including valve positioning, patient anatomy, or presence of pre-existing patient conditions.A conclusive cause could not be determined from the limited information available but the reported leaflet tear may have been a contributing cause.Per the device instructions for use (ifu), in the event that valve function or sealing is impaired due to excessive calcification or incomplete expansion, a post-implant balloon dilation of the bioprosthesis may improve valve function and sealing.To ensure patient safety, valve size and patient anatomy must be considered when selecting the size of the balloon used for dilatation.¿ the balloon size chosen for dilatation should not exceed the diameter of the native aortic annulus.Refer to the specific balloon catheter manufacturer's labeling for proper instruction on the use of balloon catheter devices.In this case, it was unknown if a post-implant balloon aortic valvuloplasty (bav) was performed.Thus, a conclusive root cause of this cuspal tear cannot be determined at this time.There is no information to suggest a device quality deficiency that may have caused or contributed to this event.This event does not allege a device misuse or malfunction occurred.Updated: h6 medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
EVOLUT R TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE
Type of Device
AORTIC VALVE, PROSTHESIS, PERCUTANEOUSLY DELIV
Manufacturer (Section D)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer (Section G)
MEDTRONIC HEART VALVES DIVISION
1851 e deere ave
santa ana CA 92705
Manufacturer Contact
alison sweeney
parkmore business park west
galway 
EI  
091708096
MDR Report Key15921539
MDR Text Key304869259
Report Number2025587-2022-03415
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code NPT
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeBR
PMA/PMN Number
P130021
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/17/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/05/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Expiration Date05/09/2018
Device Model NumberEVOLUTR-29
Device Catalogue NumberEVOLUTR-29
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? Yes
Date Manufacturer Received01/13/2023
Date Device Manufactured05/24/2017
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Hospitalization; Required Intervention;
Patient Age95 YR
Patient SexMale
-
-