|
Model Number CT66LTPD |
Device Problem
Difficult to Remove (1528)
|
Patient Problem
Device Embedded In Tissue or Plaque (3165)
|
Event Date 03/30/2022 |
Event Type
malfunction
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported defective device has yet to be returned to the manufacturer for a device evaluation.An investigation into the root cause for product problem is currently in progress.The results of the investigation will be sent via a follow up medwatch.Reference (b)(4).
|
|
Event Description
|
A distributor reported an issue with a ct lowprofile titanium 6.6fr w/poly catheter.Upon completion of chemotherapy, the patient returned for a port removal procedure.During removal, the catheter was found to be difficult to remove and the decision was made to leave the residual line in situ.The surgeon feel that a fibrin sheath was present, resulting in difficulty removing because the line was adhered to the inner wall of the vessel.
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
As the reported device was not returned, angiodynamics is unable to perform a device evaluation.The customer's reported complaint description cannot be confirmed, no sample was returned. without receiving product for evaluation, we are unable to definitively determine a root cause for this incident. port placement, patient anatomy and drugs used during the multi-year in-situ treatment are potential contributing factors for difficult to remove catheter tubing.A review of the device history records was performed for the indicated lots for any deviations related to the reported failure mode of the complaint. the review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications; i.E.No ncr associated with reported failure mode.Labeling review: the instructions for use, which is supplied to the user with this catalog number, contains the following statements: absence of a blood return or a poor blood return can be a sign of a potential complication such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, fibrin formation, thrombosis or malposition.This should be evaluated prior to device usage.A blood return should be present prior to usage of device for any therapy or testing.If the patient complains of pain, or if there is swelling when the device is flushed or when medication or contrast media is administered, evaluate the device for infiltration, proper needle placement, and potential complications such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, thrombosis or malposition.Failure to assess these complaints or observations can lead to device failure.Caution: avoid piercing catheter with suture needle.Potential complications: catheter fragmentation and catheter pinch-off.Catheter placement considerations: warning: avoid medial catheter placement into sub-clavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
The reported device has been returned to the manufacturer and an investigation into the root cause for event is currently in progress.Reference (b)(4).
|
|
Manufacturer Narrative
|
Returned for evaluation was one (1) smartport.As received, approximately 11 cm of catheter was attached to the port.The outer catheter surface was found to be rough over most of the catheter.It could not be determined what caused the catheter surface to become rough and difficult to remove.No manufacturing non-conformances were observed during sample review and the catheter met dimensional specifications.The customer's reported complaint description of catheter was difficult to remove (at end of device use/treatment) was confirmed as the exterior of the catheter tubing had a rough surface indicating it was adhered to vascular tissue and/or fibrin sheath.However, we are unable to determine an exact root cause for the rough exterior surface.No manufacturing related non-conformances were observed during evaluation of the returned port/catheter tubing.Port placement, patient anatomy and drugs used during the 2+ year treatment are potential contributing factors of the rough catheter surface and the difficult to remove catheter tubing.A review of the device history records was performed for the indicated lots for any deviations related to the reported failure mode of the complaint. the review confirms that the lots met all material, assembly and performance specifications; i.E.No ncr associated with reported failure mode.Labeling review: the instructions for use, which is supplied to the user with this catalog number, contains the following statements: - absence of a blood return or a poor blood return can be a sign of a potential complication such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, fibrin formation, thrombosis or malposition.This should be evaluated prior to device usage.A blood return should be present prior to usage of device for any therapy or testing.- if the patient complains of pain, or if there is swelling when the device is flushed or when medication or contrast media is administered, evaluate the device for infiltration, proper needle placement, and potential complications such as occlusion, kinking, breakage, pinch-off syndrome, thrombosis or malposition.Failure to assess these complaints or observations can lead to device failure.Caution: avoid piercing catheter with suture needle.Potential complications: catheter fragmentation and catheter pinch-off.Catheter placement considerations: warning: avoid medial catheter placement into sub-clavian vein through percutaneous technique.This placement could lead to catheter occlusion, damage, rupture, shearing, or fragmentation due to compression of the catheter between the first rib and clavicle.Catheter shearing has been reported when the catheter is inserted via a more medial route in the subclavian vein.A review of the angiodynamics complaint system noted no adverse trends for this complaint type and product family.This type of complaint will continue to be monitored for trends.Reference (b)(4).
|
|
Search Alerts/Recalls
|
|
|