• Decrease font size
  • Return font size to normal
  • Increase font size
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

MAUDE Adverse Event Report: MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM; DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION

  • Print
  • Share
  • E-mail
-
Super Search Devices@FDA
510(k) | DeNovo | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | Recalls | PMA | HDE | Classification | Standards
CFR Title 21 | Radiation-Emitting Products | X-Ray Assembler | Medsun Reports | CLIA | TPLC
 

MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3 AXIUM; DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION Back to Search Results
Model Number UNK-NV-AXIUM
Device Problems Adverse Event Without Identified Device or Use Problem (2993); No Apparent Adverse Event (3189)
Patient Problems Hemorrhage/Bleeding (1888); Perforation (2001); Thromboembolism (2654); Vascular Dissection (3160); Unspecified Nervous System Problem (4426); Insufficient Information (4580)
Event Date 07/17/2013
Event Type  Death  
Manufacturer Narrative
Sex.This value reflects the gender of the majority of the patients reported in the article as specific patients could not be identified.Date of event.Please note that this date is based off of the date of publication of the article as the event dates were not provided in the published literature.Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
Tähtinen, o.I., manninen, h.I., vanninen, r.R., haapanen, a., seppänen, j., niskakangas, t., rinne, j., keski-nisula l.Stent-assisted embolization of recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms.Interventional neuroradiology 2013.55:1221¿1231.Doi: 10.1007/s 00234-013-1234-x summary: intracranial stents have theoretical advantages in the treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms, but the usability of intracranial stents in the retreatment of recurrent intracranial aneurysms is relatively unknown.In this study, we aim to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stentassisted embolization in the retreatment of recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms.Retrospective evaluation was carried out for 55 consecutive patients (17 men and 38 women; mean age 51.5 years), with 56 recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms electively retreated with stent-assisted embolization.The technical success rate was 91 % (50/55 patients).Procedural complications were encountered with six patients (11 %).Angiographic and clinical follow-up datawere available for 51 patients (93 %), with a mean follow-up period of 28.1 months.No rebleedings were encountered during the study period.The clinical outcome was favorable in 50 patients (91 %), with a glasgow outcome score of 4 (n=14) or 5 (n=36) at the end of the study period.Poor clinical outcome correlated with very large (>2 cm) total aneurysm size (p=0.002), large (>10 mm) recurrent aneurysm size (p=0.011), and occurrence of periprocedural complications (p<(> <<)>0.001).Stent-assisted coil embolization is beneficial for the retreatment of wide-necked recurrent or residual intracranial aneurysms, but stability and permanent occlusion of the recurrent aneurysm is unlikely if the aneurysm exceeds 2 cm in diameter, the recurrent diameter of the aneurysm exceeds 10 mm, or if mass effect is present with the recurrent aneurysm.Reported events: finnish population can be directly extrapolated to other populations, since the risk of aneurysm rupture is higher in finnish and japanese populations compared to other countries procedural complications almost invariably resulted in permanent neurological deterioration (n=4) or death (n=1) of the patient; only the patient with retroperitoneal and intraabdominal hemorrhage recovered without sequelae.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Manufacturer Narrative
Medtronic is submitting this report to comply with fda reporting regulations under 21 cfr parts 4 and 803.This report is based upon information obtained by medtronic, which the company may not have been able to fully investigate or verify prior to the date the report was required by the fda.Medtronic has made reasonable efforts to obtain more complete information and has provided as much relevant information as is available to the company as of the submission date of this report.This report does not constitute an admission or a conclusion by fda, medtronic, or its employees that the device, medtronic, or its employee caused or contributed to the event described in the report.In particular, this report does not constitute an admission by anyone that the product described in this report has any ¿defects¿ or has ¿malfunctioned¿.These words are included in the fda 3500a form and are fixed items for selection created by the fda to categorize the type of event solely for the purpose of regulatory reporting.Medtronic objects to the use of these words and others like them because of the lack of definition and the connotations implied by these terms.This statement should be included with any information or report disclosed to the public under the freedom of information act.Any required fields that are unpopulated are blank because the information is currently unknown or unavailable.A good faith effort will be made to obtain the applicable information relevant to the report.If information is provided in the future, a supplemental report will be issued.
 
Event Description
The following is a correction of the intra- or post-procedural outcomes noted.It is unclear how many procedures or events involved axium coils.- procedural complications were encountered in 6 patients, including 3 cases of perioperative aneurysm perforation, 1 case of postoperative retroperitoneal and intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and 2 cases in which an embolized large basilar tip aneurysm presented with progressive brain stem compression symptoms postoperatively.Procedural complications almost invariably resulted in permanent neurological deterioration (n=4) or death (n=1) of the patient; only the patient with retroperitoneal and intraabdominal hemorrhage recovered without sequelae.- intraprocedural adjunctive therapies were required in 5 patients: 2 cases of minor periprocedural thromboembolism successfully treated with intra-arterial abciximab, 2 cases of presumable iatrogenic vertebral dissections that were successfully stented, and 1 case where insertion of an additional intracranial stent was required due to suboptimal placement of the primary stent.Clinical sequelae or procedure-related radiographic findings were not detected in these patients postoperatively or during the available follow-up.- after the stent-assisted embolization, additional endovascular treatment was performed in 9 patients due to the additional coil compaction and regrowth of the recurrent aneurysm volume (n=7) or suboptimal initial occlusion of the recurrent aneurysm (n=2), including 1 case in which 2 additional embolizations were performed to a rapidly growing basilar tip aneurysm.However, an adequate angiographic result was not achieved in this patient; this patient was also one of the patients who developed brain stem compression symptoms from the embolized aneurysm.
 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  New Search  |  Submit an Adverse Event Report

Brand Name
AXIUM
Type of Device
DEVICE, NEUROVASCULAR EMBOLIZATION
Manufacturer (Section D)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer (Section G)
MICRO THERAPEUTICS, INC. DBA EV3
9775 toledo way
irvine CA 92618
Manufacturer Contact
glen belmer
9775 toledo way
irvine, CA 92618
6122713209
MDR Report Key15924408
MDR Text Key304895829
Report Number2029214-2022-02066
Device Sequence Number1
Product Code HCG
Combination Product (y/n)N
Reporter Country CodeFI
Number of Events Reported1
Summary Report (Y/N)N
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Foreign,Literature,Health Professional,Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup,Followup
Report Date 01/23/2023
1 Device was Involved in the Event
1 Patient was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/06/2022
Is this an Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is this a Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Model NumberUNK-NV-AXIUM
Device Catalogue NumberUNK-NV-AXIUM
Device Lot NumberUNKNOWN
Was Device Available for Evaluation? No
Is the Reporter a Health Professional? No
Date Manufacturer Received01/23/2023
Is the Device Single Use? Yes
Is This a Reprocessed and Reused Single-Use Device? No
Type of Device Usage Initial
Patient Sequence Number1
Patient Outcome(s) Death; Required Intervention; Life Threatening; Disability;
Patient Age51 YR
Patient SexFemale
-
-